AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. provides technology-enabled healthcare workforce solutions and staffing services to acute and sub-acute care hospitals, and other healthcare facilities in the United States. It operates through three segments: Nurse and Allied Solutions, Physician and Leadership Solutions, and Technology and Workforce Solutions. It offers travel nurse staffing, labor disruption staffing, local staffing, international nurse permanent placement, allied staffing, …
Full AMN analysis →
Competitive advantage assessment
Key strengths
Cash Generation ConsistentCash generation is consistent (score 0.73), indicating reliable business model.
Consistent Cash GenerationCash generation is strong and consistent (score 0.73).
Key risks
ROIC Below WACC or PeersROIC at 34.6th percentile suggests inefficient capital deployment.
AMN Healthcare Services Inc ranks #39 of 58
scored companies in Medical Care Facilities by moat score — the top 67%.
The widest moat in the group is Encompass Health Corporation (EHC)
at 77/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near AMN in Medical Care Facilities
Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.
Cost Advantage
Score 37
· 15% of the moat score
A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.
Customer Stickiness
Score 51
· 15% of the moat score
Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.
Capital Efficiency
Score 24
· 18% of the moat score
Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.
Resilience
Score 33
· 17% of the moat score
Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.
Scale & Market Position
Score 29
· 15% of the moat score
Scale matters only when it converts into economics.
AMN Healthcare Services Inc (AMN) scores 33 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #39 of 58 scored companies in Medical Care Facilities, the top 67%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 57 companies in Medical Care Facilities. Its strongest defense is Customer Stickiness (51/100) and its weakest is Capital Efficiency (24/100).
How does AMN Healthcare Services Inc compare with other Medical Care Facilities companies?
AMN Healthcare Services Inc ranks #39 of 58 scored companies in Medical Care Facilities by moat score. The widest moat in Medical Care Facilities is Encompass Health Corporation (EHC) at 77/100. The companies ranked closest are American Oncology Network, Inc. (AONCW) at 36 just above it and Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN) at 33 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 57 companies in Medical Care Facilities. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is AMN Healthcare Services Inc scored with the Corporate Default template?
Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.
Which competitive defenses are measured for AMN Healthcare Services Inc?
The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and AMN scores: Pricing Power (27), Cost Advantage (37), Customer Stickiness (51), Capital Efficiency (24), Resilience (33), Scale & Market Position (29). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.