Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. provides aerial wildfire surveillance, relief and suppression, and aerial firefighting services in the United States. The company offers fire suppression services, such as aerial firefighting support for ground crews by operating the Viking CL-415EAF (Super Scooper) aircraft to drop water quickly and directly on wildfires. It also provides aerial surveillance services via manned (Air Attack) …
Full BAER analysis →
Competitive advantage assessment
Key strengths
Cost Leadership PositionOperating margin at 76.9th percentile with strong OpEx control demonstrates cost leadership.
Operating Leverage in EffectOperating leverage is evident (score 0.69), with margins expanding over time.
Where BAER ranks in Security & Protection Services
Bridger Aerospace Group Holding ranks #15 of 27
scored companies in Security & Protection Services by moat score — the top 56%.
The widest moat in the group is NAPCO Security Technologies, In (NSSC)
at 84/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near BAER in Security & Protection Services
Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.
Cost Advantage
Score 61
· 15% of the moat score
A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.
Customer Stickiness
Score 35
· 15% of the moat score
Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.
Capital Efficiency
Score 18
· 18% of the moat score
Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.
Resilience
Score 36
· 17% of the moat score
Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.
Scale & Market Position
Score 69
· 15% of the moat score
Scale matters only when it converts into economics.
What is Bridger Aerospace Group Holding's moat score?
Bridger Aerospace Group Holding (BAER) scores 44 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #15 of 27 scored companies in Security & Protection Services, the top 56%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 26 companies in Security & Protection Services. Its strongest defense is Scale & Market Position (69/100) and its weakest is Capital Efficiency (18/100).
How does Bridger Aerospace Group Holding compare with other Security & Protection Services companies?
Bridger Aerospace Group Holding ranks #15 of 27 scored companies in Security & Protection Services by moat score. The widest moat in Security & Protection Services is NAPCO Security Technologies, In (NSSC) at 84/100. The companies ranked closest are Bridger Aerospace Group Holding (BAERW) at 47 just above it and SuperCom, Ltd. (SPCB) at 43 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 26 companies in Security & Protection Services. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is Bridger Aerospace Group Holding scored with the Corporate Default template?
Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.
Which competitive defenses are measured for Bridger Aerospace Group Holding?
The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and BAER scores: Pricing Power (51), Cost Advantage (61), Customer Stickiness (35), Capital Efficiency (18), Resilience (36), Scale & Market Position (69). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.