Bridge Investment Group Holding BRDG

Competitive advantage analysis · financial-services

Asset Management Specialized
Overall moat score
—
Insufficient data

Ranked against 174 peers in Asset Management

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Fee Revenue Quality

Insufficient Data
—
Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Fee Revenue Quality

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Client Retention & Revenue Stickiness

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Compensation Discipline

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Capital Efficiency

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Earnings Quality & Cash Conversion

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Balance Sheet Strength

Where BRDG ranks in Asset Management

Bridge Investment Group Holding ranks #166 of 173 scored companies in Asset Management by moat score — the top 96%. The widest moat in the group is Sound Point Meridian Capital Inc (SPMC) at 77/100.

# Company Moat score Rating
162 StepStone Group Inc. STEP 18/100 Weak
163 Associated Capital Group, Inc. AC 0/100 Weak
164 BlackRock Innovation and Growth Term Trust BIGZ 0/100 Weak
165 Brookfield Property Preferred LP BPYPM 0/100 Weak
166 Bridge Investment Group Holding BRDG 0/100 Weak
167 GCM Grosvenor Inc. GCMGW 0/100 Weak
168 Highest Performances Holdings I HPH 0/100 Weak
169 Logan Ridge Finance Corporation LRFC 0/100 Weak
170 Portman Ridge Finance Corporati PTMN 0/100 Weak

See every Asset Management & Capital Markets company ranked by moat score →

How BRDG scores on the Asset Management Specialized defenses

Fee Revenue Quality

Not measurable · 20% of the moat score

Fee revenue quality is the ability to charge above the industry's falling average and keep charging it.

Client Retention & Revenue Stickiness

Not measurable · 18% of the moat score

Assets under management leave far more easily than they arrive, and the fee leaves with them.

Compensation Discipline

Not measurable · 18% of the moat score

Compensation is the largest expense in asset management and the one that decides whether a good year ever reaches shareholders.

Capital Efficiency

Not measurable · 20% of the moat score

Asset managers are asset-light: with little capital employed, a healthy business should earn a very high return on equity, and a merely average one is a real warning.

Earnings Quality & Cash Conversion

Not measurable · 14% of the moat score

Reported profits here can be flattered by performance fees, seed-capital gains and consolidated fund accounting, none of which recur reliably.

Balance Sheet Strength

Not measurable · 10% of the moat score

Because the business needs so little capital, an asset manager carrying meaningful debt has usually borrowed to buy another manager or to fund distributions.

How each Asset Management Specialized defense is measured, in full →

Understanding BRDG's moat

What is Bridge Investment Group Holding's moat score?

Bridge Investment Group Holding (BRDG) scores 0 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as weak. It ranks #166 of 173 scored companies in Asset Management, the top 96%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 174 companies in Asset Management.

How does Bridge Investment Group Holding compare with other Asset Management companies?

Bridge Investment Group Holding ranks #166 of 173 scored companies in Asset Management by moat score. The widest moat in Asset Management is Sound Point Meridian Capital Inc (SPMC) at 77/100. The companies ranked closest are Brookfield Property Preferred LP (BPYPM) at 0 just above it and GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMGW) at 0 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Asset Management Specialized in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 174 companies in Asset Management. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Bridge Investment Group Holding scored with the Asset Management Specialized template?

An asset manager owns almost nothing. It charges a fee on someone else's money, pays much of that fee out in compensation, and keeps the remainder — so its economics turn on the fee rate it can defend, whether client money stays, and how much revenue survives the bonus pool. The Asset Management template scores those questions rather than the balance sheet, which in this industry is largely beside the point.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Bridge Investment Group Holding?

The Asset Management Specialized template measures 6 defenses, and BRDG scores: Fee Revenue Quality (not measurable), Client Retention & Revenue Stickiness (not measurable), Compensation Discipline (not measurable), Capital Efficiency (not measurable), Earnings Quality & Cash Conversion (not measurable), Balance Sheet Strength (not measurable). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000