Captivision Inc., together with its subsidiaries, develops, manufactures, installs, and sells G-Glass, an architectural media glass in the Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and North America. Its glass combines IT building material and architectural glass into one standalone product. G-Glass has various applications, including digital out of home media, entertainment, and marketing, as well as for architectural façades, …
Full CAPTW analysis →
Competitive advantage assessment
Key strengths
Operating Leverage in EffectOperating leverage is evident (score 0.94), with margins expanding over time.
Key risks
Commodity Pressure / Weak DifferentiationGross margin at 6.2th percentile with high volatility suggests weak pricing power or commoditized products.
Captivision Inc. Warrant ranks #15 of 18
scored companies in Building Materials by moat score — the top 83%.
The widest moat in the group is United States Lime & Minerals, (USLM)
at 82/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near CAPTW in Building Materials
How CAPTW scores on the Corporate Default defenses
Pricing Power
Score 9
· 20% of the moat score
Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.
Cost Advantage
Score 12
· 15% of the moat score
A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.
Customer Stickiness
Score 12
· 15% of the moat score
Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.
Capital Efficiency
Score 100
· 18% of the moat score
Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.
Resilience
Score 9
· 17% of the moat score
Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.
Scale & Market Position
Score 56
· 15% of the moat score
Scale matters only when it converts into economics.
Captivision Inc. Warrant (CAPTW) scores 28 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #15 of 18 scored companies in Building Materials, the top 83%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 17 companies in Building Materials. Its strongest defense is Capital Efficiency (100/100) and its weakest is Pricing Power (9/100).
How does Captivision Inc. Warrant compare with other Building Materials companies?
Captivision Inc. Warrant ranks #15 of 18 scored companies in Building Materials by moat score. The widest moat in Building Materials is United States Lime & Minerals, (USLM) at 82/100. The companies ranked closest are Loma Negra Compania Industrial (LOMA) at 30 just above it and Boise Cascade, L.L.C. (BCC) at 27 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 17 companies in Building Materials. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is Captivision Inc. Warrant scored with the Corporate Default template?
Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.
Which competitive defenses are measured for Captivision Inc. Warrant?
The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and CAPTW scores: Pricing Power (9), Cost Advantage (12), Customer Stickiness (12), Capital Efficiency (100), Resilience (9), Scale & Market Position (56). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.