Australian Oilseeds Holdings Li COOT

Competitive advantage analysis · consumer-defensive

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
27/100
Developing

About Australian Oilseeds Holdings Li

Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited, through its subsidiaries, manufactures and sells chemical free, non-genetically modified organism, and sustainable edible oils and products derived from oilseeds worldwide. It offers vegetable oils, including unrefined canola oil, premium canola oil, extra filtered canola oil, RBD canola oil, safflower oil, sunflower oil, RBD sunflower oil, soyabean oil, linseed oil, and extra virgin olive oil. The … Full COOT analysis →

Competitive advantage assessment

Key risks

  • ROIC Below WACC or Peers ROIC at 0th percentile suggests inefficient capital deployment.
  • Elevated Debt Risk Debt serviceability is weak (score 0.27), raising refinancing risk.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Developing
32

Where COOT ranks in Packaged Foods

Australian Oilseeds Holdings Li ranks #54 of 73 scored companies in Packaged Foods by moat score — the top 74%. The widest moat in the group is McCormick & Company, Incorporat (MKC-V) at 79/100.

Moat scores for companies ranked near COOT in Packaged Foods
# Company Moat score Rating
50 The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. HAIN 32/100 Developing
51 Oatly Group AB OTLY 32/100 Developing
52 Above Food Ingredients Inc. War ABVEW 28/100 Developing
53 Arcadia Biosciences, Inc. RKDA 27/100 Developing
54 Australian Oilseeds Holdings Li COOT 27/100 Developing
55 Agape ATP Corporation ATPC 25/100 Developing
56 Borealis Foods Inc. BRLSW 23/100 Weak
57 Borealis Foods Inc. BRLS 23/100 Weak
58 Beyond Meat, Inc. BYND 23/100 Weak

See every General Corporate company ranked by moat score →

How COOT scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 32 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 48 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 33 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 6 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 27 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 30 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding COOT's moat

What is Australian Oilseeds Holdings Li's moat score?

Australian Oilseeds Holdings Li (COOT) scores 27 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #54 of 73 scored companies in Packaged Foods, the top 74%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 72 companies in Packaged Foods. Its strongest defense is Cost Advantage (48/100) and its weakest is Capital Efficiency (6/100).

How does Australian Oilseeds Holdings Li compare with other Packaged Foods companies?

Australian Oilseeds Holdings Li ranks #54 of 73 scored companies in Packaged Foods by moat score. The widest moat in Packaged Foods is McCormick & Company, Incorporat (MKC-V) at 79/100. The companies ranked closest are Arcadia Biosciences, Inc. (RKDA) at 27 just above it and Agape ATP Corporation (ATPC) at 25 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 72 companies in Packaged Foods. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Australian Oilseeds Holdings Li scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Australian Oilseeds Holdings Li?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and COOT scores: Pricing Power (32), Cost Advantage (48), Customer Stickiness (33), Capital Efficiency (6), Resilience (27), Scale & Market Position (30). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000