Cross Timbers Royalty Trust CRT

Competitive advantage analysis · energy

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
81/100
Strong

About Cross Timbers Royalty Trust

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust operates as an express trust in the United States. It holds 90% net profits interests in certain producing and nonproducing royalty and overriding royalty interest properties in Texas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico; and 75% net profits working interest in four properties in Texas and three properties in Oklahoma. The company was founded in 1991 and is … Full CRT analysis →

Competitive advantage assessment

Key strengths

  • Margins Consistently Above Peers Gross margin at 100.0% (top 2%) and operating margin at 77.4% (top 6%) indicate strong pricing power.
  • Margins Stable Across Cycles Operating margin volatility is low (stability score 0.83), demonstrating pricing resilience across cycles.

Key risks

  • ROIC Below WACC or Peers ROIC at 0th percentile suggests inefficient capital deployment.
  • Elevated Debt Risk Debt serviceability is weak (score 0.00), raising refinancing risk.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Strong
91

Where CRT ranks in Oil & Gas E&P

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust ranks #5 of 93 scored companies in Oil & Gas E&P by moat score — the top 5%. The widest moat in the group is Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) at 84/100.

Moat scores for companies ranked near CRT in Oil & Gas E&P
# Company Moat score Rating
1 Texas Pacific Land Corporation TPL 84/100 Strong
2 North European Oil Royality Tru NRT 82/100 Strong
3 VOC Energy Trust Units of Benef VOC 82/100 Strong
4 Black Stone Minerals, L.P. BSM 81/100 Strong
5 Cross Timbers Royalty Trust CRT 81/100 Strong
6 Dorchester Minerals, L.P. DMLP 73/100 Moderate
7 Permianville Royalty Trust Trus PVL 71/100 Moderate
8 EOG Resources, Inc. EOG 71/100 Moderate
9 Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation MGY 71/100 Moderate

See every Commodities & Mining company ranked by moat score →

How CRT scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 91 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 64 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 86 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 73 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 91 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 80 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding CRT's moat

What is Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's moat score?

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) scores 81 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as strong. It ranks #5 of 93 scored companies in Oil & Gas E&P, the top 5%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 92 companies in Oil & Gas E&P. Its strongest defense is Pricing Power (91/100) and its weakest is Cost Advantage (64/100).

How does Cross Timbers Royalty Trust compare with other Oil & Gas E&P companies?

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust ranks #5 of 93 scored companies in Oil & Gas E&P by moat score. The widest moat in Oil & Gas E&P is Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) at 84/100. The companies ranked closest are Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) at 81 just above it and Dorchester Minerals, L.P. (DMLP) at 73 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 92 companies in Oil & Gas E&P. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Cross Timbers Royalty Trust scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and CRT scores: Pricing Power (91), Cost Advantage (64), Customer Stickiness (86), Capital Efficiency (73), Resilience (91), Scale & Market Position (80). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000