Diamondback Energy, Inc. FANG

Competitive advantage analysis · energy

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
40/100
Developing

Ranked against 92 peers in Oil & Gas E&P

About Diamondback Energy, Inc.

Diamondback Energy, Inc., an independent oil and natural gas company, acquires, develops, explores, and exploits unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas, the United States. The company primarily focuses on the development of the Spraberry and Wolfcamp formations of the Midland Basin; and the Wolfcamp and Bone Spring formations of the Delaware Basin, … Full FANG analysis →

Key risks

  • Commodity Pressure / Weak Differentiation Gross margin at 38.3th percentile with high volatility suggests weak pricing power or commoditized products.
  • Scale Without Profitability Despite scale, profitability lags peers (score 0.33), suggesting limited competitive advantage.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Developing
31
Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Pricing Power

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Cost Advantage

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Customer Stickiness

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Capital Efficiency

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Resilience

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Scale & Market Position

Where FANG ranks in Oil & Gas E&P

Diamondback Energy, Inc. ranks #63 of 93 scored companies in Oil & Gas E&P by moat score — the top 68%. The widest moat in the group is Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) at 84/100.

# Company Moat score Rating
59 Calumet, Inc CLMT 42/100 Developing
60 Vermilion Energy Inc. VET 41/100 Developing
61 Greenfire Resources Ltd. GFR 40/100 Developing
62 Granite Ridge Resources, Inc. GRNT 40/100 Developing
63 Diamondback Energy, Inc. FANG 40/100 Developing
64 Chord Energy Corporation CHRD 39/100 Developing
65 Obsidian Energy Ltd. OBE 34/100 Developing
66 Pedevco Corp. PED 33/100 Developing
67 Gran Tierra Energy Inc. GTE 32/100 Developing

See every Commodities & Mining company ranked by moat score →

How FANG scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 31 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 62 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 48 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 38 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 37 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 25 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding FANG's moat

What is Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s moat score?

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) scores 40 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #63 of 93 scored companies in Oil & Gas E&P, the top 68%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 92 companies in Oil & Gas E&P. Its strongest defense is Cost Advantage (62/100) and its weakest is Scale & Market Position (25/100).

How does Diamondback Energy, Inc. compare with other Oil & Gas E&P companies?

Diamondback Energy, Inc. ranks #63 of 93 scored companies in Oil & Gas E&P by moat score. The widest moat in Oil & Gas E&P is Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) at 84/100. The companies ranked closest are Granite Ridge Resources, Inc. (GRNT) at 40 just above it and Chord Energy Corporation (CHRD) at 39 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 92 companies in Oil & Gas E&P. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Diamondback Energy, Inc. scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Diamondback Energy, Inc.?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and FANG scores: Pricing Power (31), Cost Advantage (62), Customer Stickiness (48), Capital Efficiency (38), Resilience (37), Scale & Market Position (25). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000