First Hawaiian, Inc. operates as a bank holding company for First Hawaiian Bank that provides a range of banking products and services to consumer and commercial customers in the United States. The company operates in three segments: Retail Banking, Commercial Banking, and Treasury and Other. It offers various deposit products, including checking, savings, and time deposit accounts, and other deposit …
Full FHB analysis →
Competitive advantage assessment
Key strengths
Strong Capital PositionCapital position is strong (score 1.00), exceeding regulatory minimums.
Strong Net Interest MarginNet interest margin proxy is strong (score 0.79).
The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks
against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.
Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.
Premium access
Unlock full defense analysis
Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.
First Hawaiian, Inc. ranks #45 of 393
scored companies in Banks - Regional by moat score — the top 11%.
The widest moat in the group is 1st Source Corporation (SRCE)
at 86/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near FHB in Banks - Regional
A deposit franchise is the cheapest and most valuable thing a bank can own.
Lending Advantage
Score 67
· 18% of the moat score
Lending advantage is the ability to originate loans at attractive spreads without buying that volume with looser credit standards.
Capital Strength
Score 84
· 20% of the moat score
Capital is the buffer between loan losses and insolvency, and it is what regulators judge a bank on first.
Cost Discipline
Score 67
· 16% of the moat score
Banking carries high fixed costs in branches, compliance and technology, so what it costs to run the bank relative to what the bank earns is a genuine competitive variable.
Revenue Diversification
Score 66
· 14% of the moat score
A bank earning everything from net interest income is a leveraged bet on the rate cycle.
Risk Management
Score 62
· 10% of the moat score
Risk management is the defense that only reveals itself late.
First Hawaiian, Inc. (FHB) scores 72 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as moderate. It ranks #45 of 393 scored companies in Banks - Regional, the top 11%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 399 companies in Banks - Regional. Its strongest defense is Capital Strength (84/100) and its weakest is Risk Management (62/100).
How does First Hawaiian, Inc. compare with other Banks - Regional companies?
First Hawaiian, Inc. ranks #45 of 393 scored companies in Banks - Regional by moat score. The widest moat in Banks - Regional is 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) at 86/100. The companies ranked closest are PFBC (PFBC) at 73 just above it and German American Bancorp, Inc. (GABC) at 72 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Bank Specialized in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 399 companies in Banks - Regional. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is First Hawaiian, Inc. scored with the Bank Specialized template?
A bank does not sell a product at a margin. It funds itself, lends at a spread, and books profits that remain an estimate until the loans are actually repaid. That makes the usual margin-and-return questions misleading, so the Bank template scores what really determines a bank's durability: where its funding comes from, what it lends against, how much capital stands behind it, and whether it has been pricing risk honestly.
Which competitive defenses are measured for First Hawaiian, Inc.?
The Bank Specialized template measures 6 defenses, and FHB scores: Deposit Franchise (80), Lending Advantage (67), Capital Strength (84), Cost Discipline (67), Revenue Diversification (66), Risk Management (62). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.