Fold Holdings, Inc., a bitcoin financial services company, provides access to bitcoin through a suite of consumer financial products in the United States. Its financial services platform allows consumers to accumulate, save, and use bitcoin to accomplish financial goals. It offers consumers an FDIC insured checking account, a Visa prepaid debit card, bill payments, and an extensive catalog of merchant …
Full FLD analysis →
Competitive advantage assessment
Key strengths
Margins Stable Across CyclesOperating margin volatility is low (stability score 0.91), demonstrating pricing resilience across cycles.
Strong Liquidity BufferLiquidity position is strong (score 0.76), providing operational cushion.
Key risks
ROIC Below WACC or PeersROIC at 8.5th percentile suggests inefficient capital deployment.
FTAC Emerald Acquisition Corp. ranks #157 of 316
scored companies in Shell Companies by moat score — the top 50%.
The widest moat in the group is AI TRANSPORTATION ACQUISITION C (AITR)
at 97/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near FLD in Shell Companies
Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.
Cost Advantage
Score 44
· 15% of the moat score
A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.
Customer Stickiness
Score 54
· 15% of the moat score
Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.
Capital Efficiency
Score 5
· 18% of the moat score
Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.
Resilience
Score 52
· 17% of the moat score
Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.
Scale & Market Position
Score 27
· 15% of the moat score
Scale matters only when it converts into economics.
What is FTAC Emerald Acquisition Corp.'s moat score?
FTAC Emerald Acquisition Corp. (FLD) scores 35 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #157 of 316 scored companies in Shell Companies, the top 50%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 315 companies in Shell Companies. Its strongest defense is Customer Stickiness (54/100) and its weakest is Capital Efficiency (5/100).
How does FTAC Emerald Acquisition Corp. compare with other Shell Companies companies?
FTAC Emerald Acquisition Corp. ranks #157 of 316 scored companies in Shell Companies by moat score. The widest moat in Shell Companies is AI TRANSPORTATION ACQUISITION C (AITR) at 97/100. The companies ranked closest are Fold Holdings, Inc. Warrant (FLDDW) at 36 just above it and Bleichroeder Acquisition Corp I - Class A (BACQ) at 35 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 315 companies in Shell Companies. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is FTAC Emerald Acquisition Corp. scored with the Corporate Default template?
Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.
Which competitive defenses are measured for FTAC Emerald Acquisition Corp.?
The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and FLD scores: Pricing Power (48), Cost Advantage (44), Customer Stickiness (54), Capital Efficiency (5), Resilience (52), Scale & Market Position (27). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.