Full House Resorts, Inc. FLL

Competitive advantage analysis · consumer-cyclical

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
24/100
Weak

Ranked against 17 peers in Resorts & Casinos

About Full House Resorts, Inc.

Full House Resorts, Inc. owns, leases, operates, develops, manages, and invests in casinos, and related hospitality and entertainment facilities in the United States. It operates through Midwest & South, West, and Contracted Sports Wagering segments. The company's properties include American Place in Waukegan, Illinois; Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel in Hancock County, Mississippi; Rising Star Casino Resort in Rising Sun, … Full FLL analysis →

Key strengths

  • Revenue Growth Consistent Revenue growth volatility is low (stability score 0.71), suggesting sticky customer base.

Key risks

  • ROIC Below WACC or Peers ROIC at 12.5th percentile suggests inefficient capital deployment.
  • Elevated Debt Risk Debt serviceability is weak (score 0.18), raising refinancing risk.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Developing
33
Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Pricing Power

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Cost Advantage

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Customer Stickiness

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Capital Efficiency

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Resilience

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Scale & Market Position

Where FLL ranks in Resorts & Casinos

Full House Resorts, Inc. ranks #18 of 18 scored companies in Resorts & Casinos by moat score — the top 100%. The widest moat in the group is Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. (MCRI) at 83/100.

# Company Moat score Rating
10 MGM Resorts International MGM 51/100 Moderate
11 Studio City International Holdi MSC 50/100 Developing
12 Marriott Vacations Worldwide Co VAC 48/100 Developing
13 Melco Resorts & Entertainment L MLCO 43/100 Developing
14 Golden Entertainment, Inc. GDEN 39/100 Developing
15 Century Casinos, Inc. CNTY 34/100 Developing
16 Bally's Corporation BALY 25/100 Weak
17 PENN Entertainment, Inc. PENN 25/100 Weak
18 Full House Resorts, Inc. FLL 24/100 Weak

See every General Corporate company ranked by moat score →

How FLL scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 33 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 12 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 45 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 12 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 14 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 21 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding FLL's moat

What is Full House Resorts, Inc.'s moat score?

Full House Resorts, Inc. (FLL) scores 24 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as weak. It ranks #18 of 18 scored companies in Resorts & Casinos, the top 100%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 17 companies in Resorts & Casinos. Its strongest defense is Customer Stickiness (45/100) and its weakest is Cost Advantage (12/100).

How does Full House Resorts, Inc. compare with other Resorts & Casinos companies?

Full House Resorts, Inc. ranks #18 of 18 scored companies in Resorts & Casinos by moat score. The widest moat in Resorts & Casinos is Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. (MCRI) at 83/100. The companies ranked closest are PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN) at 25 just above it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 17 companies in Resorts & Casinos. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Full House Resorts, Inc. scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Full House Resorts, Inc.?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and FLL scores: Pricing Power (33), Cost Advantage (12), Customer Stickiness (45), Capital Efficiency (12), Resilience (14), Scale & Market Position (21). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000