Friedman Industries Inc. FRD

Competitive advantage analysis · basic-materials

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
66/100
Moderate

About Friedman Industries Inc.

Friedman Industries, Incorporated engages in the manufacture and processing of steel products in the United States. It operates in two segments, Flat-Roll Products and Tubular Products. The Flat-Roll Product segment is involved in the operation of hot-rolled coil processing facilities to cut the coils into sheets and plates, as well as the provision of process and storage services for customer-owned … Full FRD analysis →

Competitive advantage assessment

Key strengths

  • ROIC Sustainably Above Peers ROIC at 86.4th percentile exceeds peers and WACC, demonstrating superior capital allocation.
  • Margins Stable Across Cycles Operating margin volatility is low (stability score 0.88), demonstrating pricing resilience across cycles.

Key risks

  • Revenue Volatility Signals Weak Stickiness Revenue volatility is high (stability score 0.17), suggesting weak customer stickiness.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Moderate
68

Where FRD ranks in Steel

Friedman Industries Inc. ranks #7 of 27 scored companies in Steel by moat score — the top 26%. The widest moat in the group is Grupo Simec, S.A.B. de C.V. (SIM) at 79/100.

Moat scores for companies ranked near FRD in Steel
# Company Moat score Rating
3 Mesabi Trust MSB 73/100 Moderate
4 Commercial Metals Company CMC 69/100 Moderate
5 Steel Dynamics, Inc. STLD 69/100 Moderate
6 Nucor Corporation NUE 66/100 Moderate
7 Friedman Industries Inc. FRD 66/100 Moderate
8 Gerdau S.A. GGB 58/100 Moderate
9 Olympic Steel, Inc. ZEUS 58/100 Moderate
10 Arcelor Mittal NY Registry Shar MT 57/100 Moderate
11 Hongli Group Inc. HLP 56/100 Moderate

See every Commodities & Mining company ranked by moat score →

How FRD scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 68 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 63 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 38 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 87 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 64 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 68 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding FRD's moat

What is Friedman Industries Inc.'s moat score?

Friedman Industries Inc. (FRD) scores 66 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as moderate. It ranks #7 of 27 scored companies in Steel, the top 26%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 26 companies in Steel. Its strongest defense is Capital Efficiency (87/100) and its weakest is Customer Stickiness (38/100).

How does Friedman Industries Inc. compare with other Steel companies?

Friedman Industries Inc. ranks #7 of 27 scored companies in Steel by moat score. The widest moat in Steel is Grupo Simec, S.A.B. de C.V. (SIM) at 79/100. The companies ranked closest are Nucor Corporation (NUE) at 66 just above it and Gerdau S.A. (GGB) at 58 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 26 companies in Steel. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Friedman Industries Inc. scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Friedman Industries Inc.?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and FRD scores: Pricing Power (68), Cost Advantage (63), Customer Stickiness (38), Capital Efficiency (87), Resilience (64), Scale & Market Position (68). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000