Foresight Autonomous Holdings L FRSX

Competitive advantage analysis · consumer-cyclical

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
23/100
Weak

About Foresight Autonomous Holdings L

Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd., a technology company, engages in the development of smart multi-spectral 3D vision software solutions and cellular-based applications for the automotive industry in Israel, Japan, the United States, and internationally. It develops in-line-of-sight vision solutions and beyond-line-of-site accident-prevention solutions. The company offers QuadSight automotive vision solution, a four-camera multi-spectral vision solution that combines two sets of stereoscopic … Full FRSX analysis →

Competitive advantage assessment

Key strengths

  • Operating Leverage in Effect Operating leverage is evident (score 0.96), with margins expanding over time.
  • Strong Liquidity Buffer Liquidity position is strong (score 0.81), providing operational cushion.

Key risks

  • ROIC Below WACC or Peers ROIC at 3.6th percentile suggests inefficient capital deployment.
  • Below-Peer Operating Efficiency Operating margin at 7.1th percentile indicates below-peer efficiency.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Weak
20

Where FRSX ranks in Auto Parts

Foresight Autonomous Holdings L ranks #53 of 60 scored companies in Auto Parts by moat score — the top 88%. The widest moat in the group is Allison Transmission Holdings, (ALSN) at 83/100.

Moat scores for companies ranked near FRSX in Auto Parts
# Company Moat score Rating
49 Worksport, Ltd. WKSP 26/100 Developing
50 Solid Power, Inc. SLDPW 24/100 Weak
51 Solid Power, Inc. SLDP 23/100 Weak
52 Hyliion Holdings Corp. HYLN 23/100 Weak
53 Foresight Autonomous Holdings L FRSX 23/100 Weak
54 Westport Fuel Systems Inc WPRT 23/100 Weak
55 Luminar Technologies, Inc. LAZR 15/100 Weak
56 REE Automotive Ltd. REE 12/100 Weak
57 Hyzon Motors Inc. HYZNW 10/100 Weak

See every General Corporate company ranked by moat score →

How FRSX scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 20 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 5 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 7 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 6 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 28 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 71 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding FRSX's moat

What is Foresight Autonomous Holdings L's moat score?

Foresight Autonomous Holdings L (FRSX) scores 23 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as weak. It ranks #53 of 60 scored companies in Auto Parts, the top 88%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 59 companies in Auto Parts. Its strongest defense is Scale & Market Position (71/100) and its weakest is Cost Advantage (5/100).

How does Foresight Autonomous Holdings L compare with other Auto Parts companies?

Foresight Autonomous Holdings L ranks #53 of 60 scored companies in Auto Parts by moat score. The widest moat in Auto Parts is Allison Transmission Holdings, (ALSN) at 83/100. The companies ranked closest are Hyliion Holdings Corp. (HYLN) at 23 just above it and Westport Fuel Systems Inc (WPRT) at 23 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 59 companies in Auto Parts. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Foresight Autonomous Holdings L scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Foresight Autonomous Holdings L?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and FRSX scores: Pricing Power (20), Cost Advantage (5), Customer Stickiness (7), Capital Efficiency (6), Resilience (28), Scale & Market Position (71). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000