Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. provides marine expedition adventures and travel experience worldwide. It operates through Lindblad and Land Experiences segments. The Lindblad segment provides ship-based expeditions aboard customized, nimble, and intimately-scaled vessels, which offers up-close experiences in the planet's wild and remote places, and capitals of culture; and offers expedition ship which is equipped with state-of-the-art tools for in-depth exploration …
Full LIND analysis →
Competitive advantage assessment
Key strengths
ROIC Sustainably Above PeersROIC at 61.1th percentile exceeds peers and WACC, demonstrating superior capital allocation.
Operating Leverage in EffectOperating leverage is evident (score 0.61), with margins expanding over time.
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings I ranks #12 of 20
scored companies in Travel Services by moat score — the top 60%.
The widest moat in the group is Booking Holdings Inc. Common St (BKNG)
at 76/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near LIND in Travel Services
Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.
Cost Advantage
Score 42
· 15% of the moat score
A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.
Customer Stickiness
Score 43
· 15% of the moat score
Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.
Capital Efficiency
Score 47
· 18% of the moat score
Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.
Resilience
Score 35
· 17% of the moat score
Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.
Scale & Market Position
Score 52
· 15% of the moat score
Scale matters only when it converts into economics.
What is Lindblad Expeditions Holdings I's moat score?
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings I (LIND) scores 45 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #12 of 20 scored companies in Travel Services, the top 60%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 19 companies in Travel Services. Its strongest defense is Scale & Market Position (52/100) and its weakest is Resilience (35/100).
How does Lindblad Expeditions Holdings I compare with other Travel Services companies?
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings I ranks #12 of 20 scored companies in Travel Services by moat score. The widest moat in Travel Services is Booking Holdings Inc. Common St (BKNG) at 76/100. The companies ranked closest are TripAdvisor, Inc. (TRIP) at 51 just above it and Tuniu Corporation (TOUR) at 45 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 19 companies in Travel Services. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is Lindblad Expeditions Holdings I scored with the Corporate Default template?
Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.
Which competitive defenses are measured for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings I?
The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and LIND scores: Pricing Power (46), Cost Advantage (42), Customer Stickiness (43), Capital Efficiency (47), Resilience (35), Scale & Market Position (52). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.