The Marygold Companies, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides fund management services in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, and Australia. It operates through Fund Management, Food Products, Security Systems, Beauty Products, and Financial Services segments. The company offers investment fund management and advisory services to exchange traded funds and exchange traded products organized as limited partnerships or …
Full MGLD analysis →
Competitive advantage assessment
Key strengths
Sticky AUM BaseRevenue stickiness is high (stability score 0.91).
Conservative LeverageLeverage is conservative vs peers (score 0.87).
Key risks
Below-Peer Return on EquityReturn on equity lags peers (score 0.09).
High Compensation CostsCompensation costs relative to peers are high (score 0.06).
The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks
against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.
Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.
Premium access
Unlock full defense analysis
Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.
The Marygold Companies, Inc. ranks #144 of 173
scored companies in Asset Management by moat score — the top 83%.
The widest moat in the group is Sound Point Meridian Capital Inc (SPMC)
at 77/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near MGLD in Asset Management
How MGLD scores on the Asset Management Specialized defenses
Fee Revenue Quality
Score 24
· 20% of the moat score
Fee revenue quality is the ability to charge above the industry's falling average and keep charging it.
Client Retention & Revenue Stickiness
Score 60
· 18% of the moat score
Assets under management leave far more easily than they arrive, and the fee leaves with them.
Compensation Discipline
Score 10
· 18% of the moat score
Compensation is the largest expense in asset management and the one that decides whether a good year ever reaches shareholders.
Capital Efficiency
Score 16
· 20% of the moat score
Asset managers are asset-light: with little capital employed, a healthy business should earn a very high return on equity, and a merely average one is a real warning.
Earnings Quality & Cash Conversion
Score 31
· 14% of the moat score
Reported profits here can be flattered by performance fees, seed-capital gains and consolidated fund accounting, none of which recur reliably.
Balance Sheet Strength
Score 70
· 10% of the moat score
Because the business needs so little capital, an asset manager carrying meaningful debt has usually borrowed to buy another manager or to fund distributions.
What is The Marygold Companies, Inc.'s moat score?
The Marygold Companies, Inc. (MGLD) scores 32 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #144 of 173 scored companies in Asset Management, the top 83%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 174 companies in Asset Management. Its strongest defense is Balance Sheet Strength (70/100) and its weakest is Compensation Discipline (10/100).
How does The Marygold Companies, Inc. compare with other Asset Management companies?
The Marygold Companies, Inc. ranks #144 of 173 scored companies in Asset Management by moat score. The widest moat in Asset Management is Sound Point Meridian Capital Inc (SPMC) at 77/100. The companies ranked closest are KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) at 32 just above it and RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund Inc (RFM) at 32 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Asset Management Specialized in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 174 companies in Asset Management. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is The Marygold Companies, Inc. scored with the Asset Management Specialized template?
An asset manager owns almost nothing. It charges a fee on someone else's money, pays much of that fee out in compensation, and keeps the remainder — so its economics turn on the fee rate it can defend, whether client money stays, and how much revenue survives the bonus pool. The Asset Management template scores those questions rather than the balance sheet, which in this industry is largely beside the point.
Which competitive defenses are measured for The Marygold Companies, Inc.?
The Asset Management Specialized template measures 6 defenses, and MGLD scores: Fee Revenue Quality (24), Client Retention & Revenue Stickiness (60), Compensation Discipline (10), Capital Efficiency (16), Earnings Quality & Cash Conversion (31), Balance Sheet Strength (70). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.