Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. MLM

Competitive advantage analysis · basic-materials

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
67/100
Moderate

About Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., a natural resource-based building materials company, supplies aggregates and heavy-side building materials to the construction industry in the United States and internationally. It operates through East Group and West Group segments. The company offers crushed stone, sand, and gravel products; ready mixed concrete and asphalt; and paving products and services for use in the infrastructure projects, … Full MLM analysis →

Competitive advantage assessment

Key strengths

  • Cost Leadership Position Operating margin at 87.5th percentile with strong OpEx control demonstrates cost leadership.
  • Revenue Growth Consistent Revenue growth volatility is low (stability score 0.71), suggesting sticky customer base.

Key risks

  • Volatile Margins Suggest Cyclicality Margin volatility is high (stability score 0.25), suggesting cyclical exposure or competitive pressure.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Developing
47

Where MLM ranks in Building Materials

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. ranks #3 of 18 scored companies in Building Materials by moat score — the top 17%. The widest moat in the group is United States Lime & Minerals, (USLM) at 82/100.

Moat scores for companies ranked near MLM in Building Materials
# Company Moat score Rating
1 United States Lime & Minerals, USLM 82/100 Strong
2 Eagle Materials Inc EXP 75/100 Strong
3 Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. MLM 67/100 Moderate
4 Titan America SA TTAM 66/100 Moderate
5 Vulcan Materials Company (Holdi VMC 64/100 Moderate
6 Smith-Midland Corporation SMID 61/100 Moderate
7 CRH PLC CRH 61/100 Moderate
8 Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. CPAC 60/100 Moderate
9 Tecnoglass Inc. TGLS 58/100 Moderate

See every General Corporate company ranked by moat score →

How MLM scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 47 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 88 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 84 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 49 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 70 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 78 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding MLM's moat

What is Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.'s moat score?

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) scores 67 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as moderate. It ranks #3 of 18 scored companies in Building Materials, the top 17%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 17 companies in Building Materials. Its strongest defense is Cost Advantage (88/100) and its weakest is Pricing Power (47/100).

How does Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. compare with other Building Materials companies?

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. ranks #3 of 18 scored companies in Building Materials by moat score. The widest moat in Building Materials is United States Lime & Minerals, (USLM) at 82/100. The companies ranked closest are Eagle Materials Inc (EXP) at 75 just above it and Titan America SA (TTAM) at 66 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 17 companies in Building Materials. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and MLM scores: Pricing Power (47), Cost Advantage (88), Customer Stickiness (84), Capital Efficiency (49), Resilience (70), Scale & Market Position (78). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000