Motorsport Games Inc. MSGM

Competitive advantage analysis · communication-services

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
66/100
Moderate

About Motorsport Games Inc.

Motorsport Games Inc. develops and publishes multi-platform racing video games in the United States. It operates through Gaming and Esports segments. The company offers rFactor 2, a realistic racing simulation game; KartKraft, a kart racing simulator; and Le Mans Ultimate, an official game of the FIA World Endurance Championship and 24 Hours of Le Mans. It also organizes and facilitates … Full MSGM analysis →

Competitive advantage assessment

Key strengths

  • Scale Supporting Profitability Profitability at scale is strong (score 0.90), demonstrating competitive advantages.
  • Consistent Cash Generation Cash generation is strong and consistent (score 0.86).

Key risks

  • Revenue Volatility Signals Weak Stickiness Revenue volatility is high (stability score 0.30), suggesting weak customer stickiness.
  • Volatile Margins Suggest Cyclicality Margin volatility is high (stability score 0.09), suggesting cyclical exposure or competitive pressure.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Moderate
54

Where MSGM ranks in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

Motorsport Games Inc. ranks #4 of 26 scored companies in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia by moat score — the top 15%. The widest moat in the group is NetEase, Inc. (NTES) at 83/100.

Moat scores for companies ranked near MSGM in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
# Company Moat score Rating
1 NetEase, Inc. NTES 83/100 Strong
2 Electronic Arts Inc. EA 79/100 Strong
3 DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd DDI 75/100 Strong
4 Motorsport Games Inc. MSGM 66/100 Moderate
5 GRAVITY Co., Ltd. GRVY 65/100 Moderate
6 Gamehaus Holdings Inc. GMHS 58/100 Moderate
7 Bilibili Inc. BILI 58/100 Moderate
8 GCL Global Holdings Ltd GCL 56/100 Moderate
9 PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc. MYPS 55/100 Moderate

See every General Corporate company ranked by moat score →

How MSGM scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 54 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 60 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 61 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 62 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 67 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 94 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding MSGM's moat

What is Motorsport Games Inc.'s moat score?

Motorsport Games Inc. (MSGM) scores 66 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as moderate. It ranks #4 of 26 scored companies in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia, the top 15%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 25 companies in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia. Its strongest defense is Scale & Market Position (94/100) and its weakest is Pricing Power (54/100).

How does Motorsport Games Inc. compare with other Electronic Gaming & Multimedia companies?

Motorsport Games Inc. ranks #4 of 26 scored companies in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia by moat score. The widest moat in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia is NetEase, Inc. (NTES) at 83/100. The companies ranked closest are DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd (DDI) at 75 just above it and GRAVITY Co., Ltd. (GRVY) at 65 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 25 companies in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Motorsport Games Inc. scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Motorsport Games Inc.?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and MSGM scores: Pricing Power (54), Cost Advantage (60), Customer Stickiness (61), Capital Efficiency (62), Resilience (67), Scale & Market Position (94). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000