Nu Holdings Ltd. provides digital banking platform in Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, the Cayman Islands, and the United States. It offers spending solutions comprising Nu credit and prepaid card, a digitally enabled card that acts as a credit and a prepaid card; Nubank+ Tier, an evolution of the Nu experience; Ultraviolet credit and prepaid card, a premium metal credit card; mobile …
Full NU analysis →
Competitive advantage assessment
Key strengths
Strong Capital PositionCapital position is strong (score 0.76), exceeding regulatory minimums.
Strong Deposit FranchiseDeposit franchise strength is evident (profitability score 0.79).
Key risks
Revenue Concentration RiskRevenue concentration is concerning (growth stability 0.06).
The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks
against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.
Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.
Premium access
Unlock full defense analysis
Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.
Nu Holdings Ltd. ranks #173 of 393
scored companies in Banks - Regional by moat score — the top 44%.
The widest moat in the group is 1st Source Corporation (SRCE)
at 86/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near NU in Banks - Regional
A deposit franchise is the cheapest and most valuable thing a bank can own.
Lending Advantage
Score 38
· 18% of the moat score
Lending advantage is the ability to originate loans at attractive spreads without buying that volume with looser credit standards.
Capital Strength
Score 85
· 20% of the moat score
Capital is the buffer between loan losses and insolvency, and it is what regulators judge a bank on first.
Cost Discipline
Score 71
· 16% of the moat score
Banking carries high fixed costs in branches, compliance and technology, so what it costs to run the bank relative to what the bank earns is a genuine competitive variable.
Revenue Diversification
Score 5
· 14% of the moat score
A bank earning everything from net interest income is a leveraged bet on the rate cycle.
Risk Management
Score 62
· 10% of the moat score
Risk management is the defense that only reveals itself late.
Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) scores 53 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as moderate. It ranks #173 of 393 scored companies in Banks - Regional, the top 44%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 399 companies in Banks - Regional. Its strongest defense is Capital Strength (85/100) and its weakest is Revenue Diversification (5/100).
How does Nu Holdings Ltd. compare with other Banks - Regional companies?
Nu Holdings Ltd. ranks #173 of 393 scored companies in Banks - Regional by moat score. The widest moat in Banks - Regional is 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) at 86/100. The companies ranked closest are Farmers National Banc Corp. (FMNB) at 53 just above it and BanColombia S.A. (CIB) at 53 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Bank Specialized in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 399 companies in Banks - Regional. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is Nu Holdings Ltd. scored with the Bank Specialized template?
A bank does not sell a product at a margin. It funds itself, lends at a spread, and books profits that remain an estimate until the loans are actually repaid. That makes the usual margin-and-return questions misleading, so the Bank template scores what really determines a bank's durability: where its funding comes from, what it lends against, how much capital stands behind it, and whether it has been pricing risk honestly.
Which competitive defenses are measured for Nu Holdings Ltd.?
The Bank Specialized template measures 6 defenses, and NU scores: Deposit Franchise (49), Lending Advantage (38), Capital Strength (85), Cost Discipline (71), Revenue Diversification (5), Risk Management (62). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.