Richardson Electronics, Ltd. provides engineered solutions, power grid and microwave tube, and related consumables in North America, the Asia Pacific, Europe, and Latin America. The company's Power and Microwave Technologies segment manufactures electron tubes and radio frequency (RF), microwave and power components used in semiconductor manufacturing equipment, RF, and wireless and industrial power applications, as well as various applications, including …
Full RELL analysis →
Competitive advantage assessment
Key strengths
Strong Interest Coverage & Conservative LeverageDebt serviceability is strong (score 0.85), with robust interest coverage.
Strong Liquidity BufferLiquidity position is strong (score 0.82), providing operational cushion.
Key risks
Weak or Negative Cash FlowCash generation is weak (score 0.32), limiting financial flexibility.
Richardson Electronics, Ltd. ranks #27 of 52
scored companies in Electronic Components by moat score — the top 52%.
The widest moat in the group is Universal Display Corporation (OLED)
at 82/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near RELL in Electronic Components
Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.
Cost Advantage
Score 38
· 15% of the moat score
A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.
Customer Stickiness
Score 35
· 15% of the moat score
Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.
Capital Efficiency
Score 40
· 18% of the moat score
Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.
Resilience
Score 74
· 17% of the moat score
Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.
Scale & Market Position
Score 40
· 15% of the moat score
Scale matters only when it converts into economics.
What is Richardson Electronics, Ltd.'s moat score?
Richardson Electronics, Ltd. (RELL) scores 45 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #27 of 52 scored companies in Electronic Components, the top 52%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 51 companies in Electronic Components. Its strongest defense is Resilience (74/100) and its weakest is Customer Stickiness (35/100).
How does Richardson Electronics, Ltd. compare with other Electronic Components companies?
Richardson Electronics, Ltd. ranks #27 of 52 scored companies in Electronic Components by moat score. The widest moat in Electronic Components is Universal Display Corporation (OLED) at 82/100. The companies ranked closest are Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) at 49 just above it and Rogers Corporation (ROG) at 44 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 51 companies in Electronic Components. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is Richardson Electronics, Ltd. scored with the Corporate Default template?
Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.
Which competitive defenses are measured for Richardson Electronics, Ltd.?
The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and RELL scores: Pricing Power (43), Cost Advantage (38), Customer Stickiness (35), Capital Efficiency (40), Resilience (74), Scale & Market Position (40). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.