RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. RNR

Competitive advantage analysis · financial-services

Insurance & Reinsurance
Overall moat score
60/100
Moderate

About RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.

RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, provides reinsurance and insurance products in the United States and internationally. The company operates through Property, and Casualty and Specialty segments. The Property segment writes property catastrophe excess of loss reinsurance contracts to insure insurance and reinsurance companies against natural and man-made catastrophes, including hurricanes, earthquakes, typhoons, and tsunamis, as well as winter … Full RNR analysis →

Competitive advantage assessment

Key strengths

  • Superior Returns on Float Float investment returns are strong (signal score 0.79), with ROA at 5.13% vs peers — investment income amplifies underwriting profit.
  • Lean Expense Ratio vs Peers Expense efficiency is strong (score 0.88), with operating margin at 31.4% vs peers.

Key risks

  • Volatile Underwriting Results Underwriting stability is low (score 0.23), indicating significant exposure to loss cycle or catastrophe volatility.
  • Volatile Capital Returns Signal Cat Exposure Capital adequacy stability is low (score 0.20), indicating elevated catastrophe or reserve cycle exposure.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Underwriting Discipline

Developing
45

Where RNR ranks in Financials: Insurance

RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. ranks #36 of 131 scored companies in Financials: Insurance by moat score — the top 27%. The widest moat in the group is Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MMC) at 83/100.

Moat scores for companies ranked near RNR in Financials: Insurance
# Company Moat score Rating
32 Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. RYAN 64/100 Moderate
33 Assured Guaranty Ltd. AGO 63/100 Moderate
34 Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd. HG 62/100 Moderate
35 Willis Towers Watson Public Lim WTW 61/100 Moderate
36 RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. RNR 60/100 Moderate
37 Crawford & Company CRD-A 60/100 Moderate
38 W.R. Berkley Corporation WRB 60/100 Moderate
39 Crawford & Company CRD-B 59/100 Moderate
40 Kingstone Companies, Inc KINS 58/100 Moderate

See every Insurance & Reinsurance company ranked by moat score →

How RNR scores on the Insurance & Reinsurance defenses

Underwriting Discipline

Score 45 · 25% of the moat score

Underwriting discipline is the core insurance moat, and it consists mostly of the willingness to lose business.

Float Investment Quality

Score 58 · 20% of the moat score

Float is the money an insurer holds between collecting premiums and paying claims — capital it invests but does not own.

Pricing Power

Score 73 · 18% of the moat score

For an insurer, pricing power is the ability to push rate ahead of claims inflation and keep the policyholders anyway.

Capital Strength & Solvency

Score 56 · 17% of the moat score

Capital is what lets an insurer credibly promise to pay a claim that has not happened yet, and it is scrutinised by regulators and rating agencies alike.

Operational Efficiency

Score 89 · 12% of the moat score

The expense ratio — what it costs to acquire and administer a policy — is the half of the combined ratio management fully controls.

Scale & Diversification

Score 51 · 8% of the moat score

Diversification is a real economic advantage in insurance rather than a portfolio preference: risks spread across perils, geographies and lines are less likely to arrive at once, so the same capital supports more premium.

How each Insurance & Reinsurance defense is measured, in full →

Understanding RNR's moat

What is RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.'s moat score?

RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) scores 60 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as moderate. It ranks #36 of 131 scored companies in Financials: Insurance, the top 27%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 136 companies in Financials: Insurance. Its strongest defense is Operational Efficiency (89/100) and its weakest is Underwriting Discipline (45/100).

How does RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. compare with other Financials: Insurance companies?

RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. ranks #36 of 131 scored companies in Financials: Insurance by moat score. The widest moat in Financials: Insurance is Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MMC) at 83/100. The companies ranked closest are Willis Towers Watson Public Lim (WTW) at 61 just above it and Crawford & Company (CRD-A) at 60 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Insurance & Reinsurance in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 136 companies in Financials: Insurance. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. scored with the Insurance & Reinsurance template?

An insurer is paid before it knows what its product cost, and invests the money in the meantime. Profit therefore comes from two sources that must both work: pricing risk better than rivals, and earning a return on the float those premiums create. The Insurance template scores that pair, along with the capital that lets a company survive the year in which the losses arrive together.

Which competitive defenses are measured for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.?

The Insurance & Reinsurance template measures 6 defenses, and RNR scores: Underwriting Discipline (45), Float Investment Quality (58), Pricing Power (73), Capital Strength & Solvency (56), Operational Efficiency (89), Scale & Diversification (51). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000