Tredegar Corporation TG

Competitive advantage analysis · industrials

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
47/100
Developing

About Tredegar Corporation

Tredegar Corporation, through its subsidiaries, manufactures and sells aluminum extrusions, and polyethylene and polypropylene plastic films in the United States and internationally. It operates through Aluminum Extrusions and PE Films segments. The Aluminum Extrusions segment produces soft and medium strength alloyed, custom fabricated, and finished aluminum extrusions for the building and construction, automotive and transportation, consumer durable goods, machinery and … Full TG analysis →

Competitive advantage assessment

Key strengths

  • Margins Stable Across Cycles Operating margin volatility is low (stability score 0.74), demonstrating pricing resilience across cycles.

Key risks

  • Liquidity Concerns Liquidity is concerning (score 0.21), raising questions about short-term obligations.
  • Weak or Negative Cash Flow Cash generation is weak (score 0.39), limiting financial flexibility.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Moderate
53

Where TG ranks in Metal Fabrication

Tredegar Corporation ranks #13 of 20 scored companies in Metal Fabrication by moat score — the top 65%. The widest moat in the group is Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) at 83/100.

Moat scores for companies ranked near TG in Metal Fabrication
# Company Moat score Rating
9 Worthington Enterprises, Inc. WOR 56/100 Moderate
10 Insteel Industries, Inc. IIIN 54/100 Moderate
11 Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. GIFI 51/100 Moderate
12 Mayville Engineering Company, I MEC 49/100 Developing
13 Tredegar Corporation TG 47/100 Developing
14 Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation AP 31/100 Developing
15 TechPrecision Corporation TPCS 31/100 Developing
16 Ryerson Holding Corporation RYI 28/100 Developing
17 Highway Holdings Limited HIHO 25/100 Developing

See every General Corporate company ranked by moat score →

How TG scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 52 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 50 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 49 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 46 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 44 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 41 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding TG's moat

What is Tredegar Corporation's moat score?

Tredegar Corporation (TG) scores 47 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #13 of 20 scored companies in Metal Fabrication, the top 65%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 19 companies in Metal Fabrication. Its strongest defense is Pricing Power (52/100) and its weakest is Scale & Market Position (41/100).

How does Tredegar Corporation compare with other Metal Fabrication companies?

Tredegar Corporation ranks #13 of 20 scored companies in Metal Fabrication by moat score. The widest moat in Metal Fabrication is Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) at 82/100. The companies ranked closest are Mayville Engineering Company, I (MEC) at 49 just above it and Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) at 31 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 19 companies in Metal Fabrication. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Tredegar Corporation scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Tredegar Corporation?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and TG scores: Pricing Power (52), Cost Advantage (50), Customer Stickiness (49), Capital Efficiency (46), Resilience (44), Scale & Market Position (41). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000