UP Fintech Holding Limited TIGR

Competitive advantage analysis · financial-services

Asset Management Specialized
Overall moat score
77/100
Strong

About UP Fintech Holding Limited

UP Fintech Holding Limited provides online brokerage services focusing on Chinese investors in New Zealand, the Cayman Island, Singapore, the United States, and internationally. The company has developed a brokerage platform, Tiger Trade which allows investor to trade stocks, options, warrants, and other financial instruments that can be accessed through its APP and website. It also provides value-added services, including … Full TIGR analysis →

Competitive advantage assessment

Key strengths

  • Lean Compensation Structure Compensation discipline is strong (cost efficiency score 0.92).
  • High Return on Equity Return on equity ranks highly vs peers (score 0.82).

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Fee Revenue Quality

Strong
76

Where TIGR ranks in Capital Markets

UP Fintech Holding Limited ranks #6 of 67 scored companies in Capital Markets by moat score — the top 9%. The widest moat in the group is Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) at 83/100.

Moat scores for companies ranked near TIGR in Capital Markets
# Company Moat score Rating
2 MarketAxess Holdings, Inc. MKTX 81/100 Strong
3 Tradeweb Markets Inc. TW 80/100 Strong
4 Futu Holdings Limited FUTU 80/100 Strong
5 Charles Schwab Corporation (The SCHW 77/100 Strong
6 UP Fintech Holding Limited TIGR 77/100 Strong
7 Virtu Financial, Inc. VIRT 76/100 Strong
8 PJT Partners Inc. PJT 73/100 Moderate
9 Morgan Stanley MS 70/100 Moderate
10 Marex Group plc MRX 70/100 Moderate

See every Asset Management & Capital Markets company ranked by moat score →

How TIGR scores on the Asset Management Specialized defenses

Fee Revenue Quality

Score 76 · 20% of the moat score

Fee revenue quality is the ability to charge above the industry's falling average and keep charging it.

Client Retention & Revenue Stickiness

Score 75 · 18% of the moat score

Assets under management leave far more easily than they arrive, and the fee leaves with them.

Compensation Discipline

Score 86 · 18% of the moat score

Compensation is the largest expense in asset management and the one that decides whether a good year ever reaches shareholders.

Capital Efficiency

Score 77 · 20% of the moat score

Asset managers are asset-light: with little capital employed, a healthy business should earn a very high return on equity, and a merely average one is a real warning.

Earnings Quality & Cash Conversion

Score 84 · 14% of the moat score

Reported profits here can be flattered by performance fees, seed-capital gains and consolidated fund accounting, none of which recur reliably.

Balance Sheet Strength

Score 57 · 10% of the moat score

Because the business needs so little capital, an asset manager carrying meaningful debt has usually borrowed to buy another manager or to fund distributions.

How each Asset Management Specialized defense is measured, in full →

Understanding TIGR's moat

What is UP Fintech Holding Limited's moat score?

UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) scores 77 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as strong. It ranks #6 of 67 scored companies in Capital Markets, the top 9%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 74 companies in Capital Markets. Its strongest defense is Compensation Discipline (86/100) and its weakest is Balance Sheet Strength (57/100).

How does UP Fintech Holding Limited compare with other Capital Markets companies?

UP Fintech Holding Limited ranks #6 of 67 scored companies in Capital Markets by moat score. The widest moat in Capital Markets is Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) at 83/100. The companies ranked closest are Charles Schwab Corporation (The (SCHW) at 77 just above it and Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT) at 76 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Asset Management Specialized in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 74 companies in Capital Markets. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is UP Fintech Holding Limited scored with the Asset Management Specialized template?

An asset manager owns almost nothing. It charges a fee on someone else's money, pays much of that fee out in compensation, and keeps the remainder — so its economics turn on the fee rate it can defend, whether client money stays, and how much revenue survives the bonus pool. The Asset Management template scores those questions rather than the balance sheet, which in this industry is largely beside the point.

Which competitive defenses are measured for UP Fintech Holding Limited?

The Asset Management Specialized template measures 6 defenses, and TIGR scores: Fee Revenue Quality (76), Client Retention & Revenue Stickiness (75), Compensation Discipline (86), Capital Efficiency (77), Earnings Quality & Cash Conversion (84), Balance Sheet Strength (57). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000