Wearable Devices Ltd. engages in the development of a non-invasive neural input interface for controlling digital devices using subtle touchless finger movements. The company offers Mudra development kits that enable users to control digital devices, including consumer electronics, smart watches, smartphones, augmented reality glasses, virtual reality headsets, televisions, personal and laptop computers, drones, robots, and others through finger movements and …
Full WLDSW analysis →
Competitive advantage assessment
Key strengths
Operating Leverage in EffectOperating leverage is evident (score 1.00), with margins expanding over time.
Strong Liquidity BufferLiquidity position is strong (score 0.94), providing operational cushion.
Key risks
Commodity Pressure / Weak DifferentiationGross margin at 11.1th percentile with high volatility suggests weak pricing power or commoditized products.
Below-Peer Operating EfficiencyOperating margin at 11.1th percentile indicates below-peer efficiency.
The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks
against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.
Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.
Premium access
Unlock full defense analysis
Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.
WEARABLE DEVICES LTD C/WTS 29/0 ranks #15 of 19
scored companies in Consumer Electronics by moat score — the top 79%.
The widest moat in the group is Apple Inc. (AAPL)
at 84/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near WLDSW in Consumer Electronics
How WLDSW scores on the Corporate Default defenses
Pricing Power
Score 8
· 20% of the moat score
Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.
Cost Advantage
Score 11
· 15% of the moat score
A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.
Customer Stickiness
Score 14
· 15% of the moat score
Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.
Capital Efficiency
Score 15
· 18% of the moat score
Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.
Resilience
Score 45
· 17% of the moat score
Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.
Scale & Market Position
Score 58
· 15% of the moat score
Scale matters only when it converts into economics.
What is WEARABLE DEVICES LTD C/WTS 29/0's moat score?
WEARABLE DEVICES LTD C/WTS 29/0 (WLDSW) scores 24 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as weak. It ranks #15 of 19 scored companies in Consumer Electronics, the top 79%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 18 companies in Consumer Electronics. Its strongest defense is Scale & Market Position (58/100) and its weakest is Pricing Power (8/100).
How does WEARABLE DEVICES LTD C/WTS 29/0 compare with other Consumer Electronics companies?
WEARABLE DEVICES LTD C/WTS 29/0 ranks #15 of 19 scored companies in Consumer Electronics by moat score. The widest moat in Consumer Electronics is Apple Inc. (AAPL) at 84/100. The companies ranked closest are Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. (RIME) at 30 just above it and Wearable Devices Ltd. (WLDS) at 21 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 18 companies in Consumer Electronics. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is WEARABLE DEVICES LTD C/WTS 29/0 scored with the Corporate Default template?
Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.
Which competitive defenses are measured for WEARABLE DEVICES LTD C/WTS 29/0?
The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and WLDSW scores: Pricing Power (8), Cost Advantage (11), Customer Stickiness (14), Capital Efficiency (15), Resilience (45), Scale & Market Position (58). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.