TEN Holdings, Inc. provides event planning, production, and broadcasting services in the United States. The company organize virtual, hybrid, and physical events, including conferences, marketing events, product launches, trainings, and investors and shareholder meetings. Its events are enabled by its Xyvid Pro Platform, an internet-based broadcast platform with interactive engagement tools designed to provide web broadcast audiences with a dynamic, …
Full XHLD analysis →
TEN Holdings, Inc. ranks #18 of 18
scored companies in Broadcasting by moat score — the top 100%.
The widest moat in the group is TEGNA Inc (TGNA)
at 84/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near XHLD in Broadcasting
Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.
Cost Advantage
Score 0
· 15% of the moat score
A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.
Customer Stickiness
Score 51
· 15% of the moat score
Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.
Capital Efficiency
Score 0
· 18% of the moat score
Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.
Resilience
Score 13
· 17% of the moat score
Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.
Scale & Market Position
Score 22
· 15% of the moat score
Scale matters only when it converts into economics.
TEN Holdings, Inc. (XHLD) scores 16 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as weak. It ranks #18 of 18 scored companies in Broadcasting, the top 100%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 17 companies in Broadcasting. Its strongest defense is Customer Stickiness (51/100) and its weakest is Cost Advantage (0/100).
How does TEN Holdings, Inc. compare with other Broadcasting companies?
TEN Holdings, Inc. ranks #18 of 18 scored companies in Broadcasting by moat score. The widest moat in Broadcasting is TEGNA Inc (TGNA) at 84/100. The companies ranked closest are Mediaco Holding Inc. (MDIA) at 27 just above it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 17 companies in Broadcasting. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is TEN Holdings, Inc. scored with the Corporate Default template?
Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.
Which competitive defenses are measured for TEN Holdings, Inc.?
The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and XHLD scores: Pricing Power (11), Cost Advantage (0), Customer Stickiness (51), Capital Efficiency (0), Resilience (13), Scale & Market Position (22). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.