Xinyuan Real Estate Co Ltd XIN

Competitive advantage analysis · real-estate

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
—
Insufficient data

Ranked against 15 peers in Real Estate - Development

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Insufficient Data
—
Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Pricing Power

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Cost Advantage

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Customer Stickiness

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Capital Efficiency

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Resilience

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Scale & Market Position

Where XIN ranks in Real Estate - Development

Xinyuan Real Estate Co Ltd ranks #16 of 16 scored companies in Real Estate - Development by moat score — the top 100%. The widest moat in the group is Corporacion Inmobiliaria Vesta, (VTMX) at 82/100.

# Company Moat score Rating
8 Five Point Holdings, LLC FPH 52/100 Moderate
9 Landsea Homes Corporation LSEAW 48/100 Developing
10 Murano Global Investments PLC MRNO 34/100 Developing
11 Murano Global Investments PLC W MRNOW 30/100 Developing
12 Belpointe PREP, LLC OZ 26/100 Developing
13 Alset Inc. AEI 18/100 Weak
14 Landsea Homes Corporation LSEA 0/100 Weak
15 Safe and Green Development Corp SGD 0/100 Weak
16 Xinyuan Real Estate Co Ltd XIN 0/100 Weak

See every General Corporate company ranked by moat score →

How XIN scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Not measurable · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Not measurable · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Not measurable · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Not measurable · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Not measurable · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Not measurable · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding XIN's moat

What is Xinyuan Real Estate Co Ltd's moat score?

Xinyuan Real Estate Co Ltd (XIN) scores 0 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as weak. It ranks #16 of 16 scored companies in Real Estate - Development, the top 100%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 15 companies in Real Estate - Development.

How does Xinyuan Real Estate Co Ltd compare with other Real Estate - Development companies?

Xinyuan Real Estate Co Ltd ranks #16 of 16 scored companies in Real Estate - Development by moat score. The widest moat in Real Estate - Development is Corporacion Inmobiliaria Vesta, (VTMX) at 82/100. The companies ranked closest are Safe and Green Development Corp (SGD) at 0 just above it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 15 companies in Real Estate - Development. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Xinyuan Real Estate Co Ltd scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Xinyuan Real Estate Co Ltd?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and XIN scores: Pricing Power (not measurable), Cost Advantage (not measurable), Customer Stickiness (not measurable), Capital Efficiency (not measurable), Resilience (not measurable), Scale & Market Position (not measurable). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000