ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, provides container shipping and related services in Israel and internationally. The company offers door-to-door and port-to-port transportation services for various types of customers, including end-users, consolidators, and freight forwarders. It also provides ZIMonitor, a reefer cargo tracking service. As of December 31, 2024, it operated a fleet of 145 vessels, such …
Full ZIM analysis →
Competitive advantage assessment
Key strengths
ROIC Sustainably Above PeersROIC at 96.8th percentile exceeds peers and WACC, demonstrating superior capital allocation.
Consistent Cash GenerationCash generation is strong and consistent (score 0.78).
Key risks
Commodity Pressure / Weak DifferentiationGross margin at 34.4th percentile with high volatility suggests weak pricing power or commoditized products.
ZIM Integrated Shipping Service ranks #20 of 34
scored companies in Marine Shipping by moat score — the top 59%.
The widest moat in the group is Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA)
at 86/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near ZIM in Marine Shipping
Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.
Cost Advantage
Score 59
· 15% of the moat score
A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.
Customer Stickiness
Score 55
· 15% of the moat score
Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.
Capital Efficiency
Score 61
· 18% of the moat score
Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.
Resilience
Score 57
· 17% of the moat score
Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.
Scale & Market Position
Score 32
· 15% of the moat score
Scale matters only when it converts into economics.
What is ZIM Integrated Shipping Service's moat score?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Service (ZIM) scores 47 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #20 of 34 scored companies in Marine Shipping, the top 59%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 33 companies in Marine Shipping. Its strongest defense is Capital Efficiency (61/100) and its weakest is Pricing Power (25/100).
How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Service compare with other Marine Shipping companies?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Service ranks #20 of 34 scored companies in Marine Shipping by moat score. The widest moat in Marine Shipping is Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA) at 86/100. The companies ranked closest are Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp (SHIP) at 52 just above it and Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd (PANL) at 47 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 33 companies in Marine Shipping. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is ZIM Integrated Shipping Service scored with the Corporate Default template?
Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.
Which competitive defenses are measured for ZIM Integrated Shipping Service?
The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and ZIM scores: Pricing Power (25), Cost Advantage (59), Customer Stickiness (55), Capital Efficiency (61), Resilience (57), Scale & Market Position (32). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.