AERTW

Competitive advantage analysis · industrials

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
46/100
Developing

About

Aeries Technology, Inc. provides professional and technology consulting services in North America, the Asia Pacific, and internationally. The company offers professional advisory services, such as the participation of senior leadership, recommending strategies and practices related to operating model design, consultation on various areas, market availability, regulatory compliance, and optimization of tax structure; and operations management services, including application engineering, information … Full AERTW analysis →

Competitive advantage assessment

Key strengths

  • ROIC Sustainably Above Peers ROIC at 100.0th percentile exceeds peers and WACC, demonstrating superior capital allocation.

Key risks

  • Commodity Pressure / Weak Differentiation Gross margin at 11.8th percentile with high volatility suggests weak pricing power or commoditized products.
  • Scale Without Profitability Despite scale, profitability lags peers (score 0.29), suggesting limited competitive advantage.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Developing
29

Where AERTW ranks in Consulting Services

ranks #11 of 18 scored companies in Consulting Services by moat score — the top 61%. The widest moat in the group is SBC Medical Group Holdings Inco (SBC) at 81/100.

Moat scores for companies ranked near AERTW in Consulting Services
# Company Moat score Rating
7 FTI Consulting, Inc. FCN 65/100 Moderate
8 Equifax, Inc. EFX 65/100 Moderate
9 ICF International, Inc. ICFI 62/100 Moderate
10 Aeries Technology, Inc. AERT 46/100 Developing
11 AERTW AERTW 46/100 Developing
12 Forrester Research, Inc. FORR 40/100 Developing
13 Resources Connection, Inc. RGP 34/100 Developing
14 Intelligent Group Limited INTJ 28/100 Developing
15 Greenpro Capital Corp. GRNQ 28/100 Developing

See every General Corporate company ranked by moat score →

How AERTW scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 29 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 65 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 49 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 60 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 48 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 33 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding AERTW's moat

What is AERTW's moat score?

AERTW (AERTW) scores 46 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #11 of 18 scored companies in Consulting Services, the top 61%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 17 companies in Consulting Services. Its strongest defense is Cost Advantage (65/100) and its weakest is Pricing Power (29/100).

How does AERTW compare with other Consulting Services companies?

AERTW ranks #11 of 18 scored companies in Consulting Services by moat score. The widest moat in Consulting Services is SBC Medical Group Holdings Inco (SBC) at 81/100. The companies ranked closest are Aeries Technology, Inc. (AERT) at 46 just above it and Forrester Research, Inc. (FORR) at 40 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 17 companies in Consulting Services. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is AERTW scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for AERTW?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and AERTW scores: Pricing Power (29), Cost Advantage (65), Customer Stickiness (49), Capital Efficiency (60), Resilience (48), Scale & Market Position (33). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000