BT Brands, Inc. owns and operates fast-food restaurants in the north central region of United States. The company operates Burger Time restaurants that offer various burgers and other food products, such as chicken sandwiches, pulled pork sandwiches, chicken tenders, chicken chunks, sides, and soft drinks located in Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota. It also operates Bagger Dave's Burger Tavern, …
Full BTBD analysis →
Competitive advantage assessment
Key strengths
Strong Liquidity BufferLiquidity position is strong (score 0.96), providing operational cushion.
Key risks
ROIC Below WACC or PeersROIC at 25.9th percentile suggests inefficient capital deployment.
Below-Peer Operating EfficiencyOperating margin at 25.9th percentile indicates below-peer efficiency.
The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks
against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.
Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.
Premium access
Unlock full defense analysis
Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.
BT Brands, Inc. ranks #41 of 57
scored companies in Restaurants by moat score — the top 72%.
The widest moat in the group is Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM)
at 83/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near BTBD in Restaurants
Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.
Cost Advantage
Score 28
· 15% of the moat score
A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.
Customer Stickiness
Score 35
· 15% of the moat score
Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.
Capital Efficiency
Score 24
· 18% of the moat score
Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.
Resilience
Score 41
· 17% of the moat score
Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.
Scale & Market Position
Score 29
· 15% of the moat score
Scale matters only when it converts into economics.
BT Brands, Inc. (BTBD) scores 29 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #41 of 57 scored companies in Restaurants, the top 72%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 56 companies in Restaurants. Its strongest defense is Resilience (41/100) and its weakest is Pricing Power (19/100).
How does BT Brands, Inc. compare with other Restaurants companies?
BT Brands, Inc. ranks #41 of 57 scored companies in Restaurants by moat score. The widest moat in Restaurants is Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) at 83/100. The companies ranked closest are Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR) at 32 just above it and Noodles & Company (NDLS) at 25 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 56 companies in Restaurants. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is BT Brands, Inc. scored with the Corporate Default template?
Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.
Which competitive defenses are measured for BT Brands, Inc.?
The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and BTBD scores: Pricing Power (19), Cost Advantage (28), Customer Stickiness (35), Capital Efficiency (24), Resilience (41), Scale & Market Position (29). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.