Kura Sushi USA, Inc. operates technology-enabled Japanese restaurants in the United States. The company's restaurants provide Japanese cuisine through an engaging revolving sushi service model, which is known as the Kura Experience. The company was formerly known as Kula Sushi USA, Inc. and changed its name to Kura Sushi USA, Inc. in October 2017. The company was founded in 2008 …
Full KRUS analysis →
Competitive advantage assessment
Key strengths
Strong Liquidity BufferLiquidity position is strong (score 0.81), providing operational cushion.
Operating Leverage in EffectOperating leverage is evident (score 0.87), with margins expanding over time.
Key risks
Commodity Pressure / Weak DifferentiationGross margin at 7.4th percentile with high volatility suggests weak pricing power or commoditized products.
ROIC Below WACC or PeersROIC at 33.3th percentile suggests inefficient capital deployment.
The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks
against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.
Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.
Premium access
Unlock full defense analysis
Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.
Kura Sushi USA, Inc. ranks #37 of 57
scored companies in Restaurants by moat score — the top 65%.
The widest moat in the group is Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM)
at 83/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near KRUS in Restaurants
Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.
Cost Advantage
Score 40
· 15% of the moat score
A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.
Customer Stickiness
Score 29
· 15% of the moat score
Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.
Capital Efficiency
Score 36
· 18% of the moat score
Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.
Resilience
Score 58
· 17% of the moat score
Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.
Scale & Market Position
Score 46
· 15% of the moat score
Scale matters only when it converts into economics.
Kura Sushi USA, Inc. (KRUS) scores 37 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #37 of 57 scored companies in Restaurants, the top 65%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 56 companies in Restaurants. Its strongest defense is Resilience (58/100) and its weakest is Pricing Power (16/100).
How does Kura Sushi USA, Inc. compare with other Restaurants companies?
Kura Sushi USA, Inc. ranks #37 of 57 scored companies in Restaurants by moat score. The widest moat in Restaurants is Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) at 83/100. The companies ranked closest are Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) at 39 just above it and The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. (STKS) at 36 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 56 companies in Restaurants. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is Kura Sushi USA, Inc. scored with the Corporate Default template?
Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.
Which competitive defenses are measured for Kura Sushi USA, Inc.?
The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and KRUS scores: Pricing Power (16), Cost Advantage (40), Customer Stickiness (29), Capital Efficiency (36), Resilience (58), Scale & Market Position (46). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.