Peabody Energy Corporation engages in the production of metallurgical and thermal coal. It operates through Seaborne Thermal, Seaborne Metallurgical, Powder River Basin, and Other U.S. Thermal segments. The company operates mines in New South Wales and Queensland in Australia and in Alabama and Wyoming in the United States; mining, preparation, and sale of thermal coal, sold primarily to electric utilities; …
Full BTU analysis →
Peabody Energy Corporation ranks #197 of 267
scored companies in Energy by moat score — the top 74%.
The widest moat in the group is Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL)
at 84/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near BTU in Energy
Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.
Cost Advantage
Score 49
· 15% of the moat score
A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.
Customer Stickiness
Score 43
· 15% of the moat score
Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.
Capital Efficiency
Score 19
· 18% of the moat score
Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.
Resilience
Score 54
· 17% of the moat score
Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.
Scale & Market Position
Score 19
· 15% of the moat score
Scale matters only when it converts into economics.
Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) scores 34 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #197 of 267 scored companies in Energy, the top 74%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 280 companies in Energy. Its strongest defense is Resilience (54/100) and its weakest is Capital Efficiency (19/100).
How does Peabody Energy Corporation compare with other Energy companies?
Peabody Energy Corporation ranks #197 of 267 scored companies in Energy by moat score. The widest moat in Energy is Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) at 84/100. The companies ranked closest are Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK) at 34 just above it and Obsidian Energy Ltd. (OBE) at 34 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 280 companies in Energy. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is Peabody Energy Corporation scored with the Corporate Default template?
Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.
Which competitive defenses are measured for Peabody Energy Corporation?
The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and BTU scores: Pricing Power (23), Cost Advantage (49), Customer Stickiness (43), Capital Efficiency (19), Resilience (54), Scale & Market Position (19). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.