Cogent Communications Holdings, CCOI

Competitive advantage analysis · communication-services

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
17/100
Weak

About Cogent Communications Holdings,

Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides high-speed Internet access, private network, and data center colocation space services in North America, South America, Europe, Oceania, and Africa. It offers on-net Internet access and private network services to law firms, financial services firms, and advertising and marketing firms, as well as heath care providers, educational institutions and other professional services … Full CCOI analysis →

Competitive advantage assessment

Key strengths

  • Strong Liquidity Buffer Liquidity position is strong (score 0.81), providing operational cushion.

Key risks

  • ROIC Below WACC or Peers ROIC at 7.0th percentile suggests inefficient capital deployment.
  • Commodity Pressure / Weak Differentiation Gross margin at 19.3th percentile with high volatility suggests weak pricing power or commoditized products.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Weak
16

Where CCOI ranks in Telecom Services

Cogent Communications Holdings, ranks #53 of 56 scored companies in Telecom Services by moat score — the top 95%. The widest moat in the group is Iridium Communications Inc (IRDM) at 76/100.

Moat scores for companies ranked near CCOI in Telecom Services
# Company Moat score Rating
48 Liberty Broadband Corporation - LBRDP 25/100 Developing
49 Liberty Broadband Corporation LBRDK 25/100 Weak
50 SurgePays, Inc. SURG 23/100 Weak
51 KORE Group Holdings, Inc. KORE 21/100 Weak
52 FingerMotion, Inc. FNGR 19/100 Weak
53 Cogent Communications Holdings, CCOI 17/100 Weak
54 PicoCELA Inc. PCLA 12/100 Weak
55 Altice USA, Inc. ATUS 0/100 Weak
56 United States Cellular Corporat USM 0/100 Weak

See every General Corporate company ranked by moat score →

How CCOI scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 16 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 21 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 20 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 4 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 34 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 10 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding CCOI's moat

What is Cogent Communications Holdings,'s moat score?

Cogent Communications Holdings, (CCOI) scores 17 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as weak. It ranks #53 of 56 scored companies in Telecom Services, the top 95%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 59 companies in Telecom Services. Its strongest defense is Resilience (34/100) and its weakest is Capital Efficiency (4/100).

How does Cogent Communications Holdings, compare with other Telecom Services companies?

Cogent Communications Holdings, ranks #53 of 56 scored companies in Telecom Services by moat score. The widest moat in Telecom Services is Iridium Communications Inc (IRDM) at 76/100. The companies ranked closest are FingerMotion, Inc. (FNGR) at 19 just above it and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA) at 12 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 59 companies in Telecom Services. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Cogent Communications Holdings, scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Cogent Communications Holdings,?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and CCOI scores: Pricing Power (16), Cost Advantage (21), Customer Stickiness (20), Capital Efficiency (4), Resilience (34), Scale & Market Position (10). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000