Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. engages in the manufacturing and sale of deep cycle lithium-ion batteries for recreational vehicles, marine vessels, solar and off-grid residence industries, and industrial and energy storage markets. It operates in two segments, direct-to-consumers and original equipment manufacturers. The company provides lithium power systems comprising solar panels, chargers and inverters, system monitoring, alternator regulators, accessories, and others. …
Full DFLI analysis →
Competitive advantage assessment
Key strengths
Strong Liquidity BufferLiquidity position is strong (score 0.64), providing operational cushion.
Key risks
ROIC Below WACC or PeersROIC at 13.7th percentile suggests inefficient capital deployment.
Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp ranks #36 of 55
scored companies in Electrical Equipment & Parts by moat score — the top 65%.
The widest moat in the group is Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (ESP)
at 83/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near DFLI in Electrical Equipment & Parts
Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.
Cost Advantage
Score 39
· 15% of the moat score
A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.
Customer Stickiness
Score 47
· 15% of the moat score
Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.
Capital Efficiency
Score 5
· 18% of the moat score
Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.
Resilience
Score 50
· 17% of the moat score
Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.
Scale & Market Position
Score 42
· 15% of the moat score
Scale matters only when it converts into economics.
What is Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp's moat score?
Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp (DFLI) scores 35 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #36 of 55 scored companies in Electrical Equipment & Parts, the top 65%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 54 companies in Electrical Equipment & Parts. Its strongest defense is Resilience (50/100) and its weakest is Capital Efficiency (5/100).
How does Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp compare with other Electrical Equipment & Parts companies?
Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp ranks #36 of 55 scored companies in Electrical Equipment & Parts by moat score. The widest moat in Electrical Equipment & Parts is Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (ESP) at 83/100. The companies ranked closest are ADS-TEC ENERGY PLC (ADSE) at 36 just above it and ADS-TEC ENERGY PLC Warrant (ADSEW) at 34 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 54 companies in Electrical Equipment & Parts. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp scored with the Corporate Default template?
Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.
Which competitive defenses are measured for Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp?
The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and DFLI scores: Pricing Power (34), Cost Advantage (39), Customer Stickiness (47), Capital Efficiency (5), Resilience (50), Scale & Market Position (42). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.