EDIBLE GARDEN AG INC C/WTS (TO EDBLW

Competitive advantage analysis · consumer-defensive

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
19/100
Weak

Ranked against 28 peers in Farm Products

About EDIBLE GARDEN AG INC C/WTS (TO

Edible Garden AG Incorporated, together with its subsidiaries, operate as a controlled environment agriculture farming company. It offers various packaged products, including cilantro, rosemary, mint, thyme, oregano, bay leaves, chives, poultry mix, sage, dill, buttercrunch living lettuce, basil, living butterhead lettuce, basil, parsley, arugula spring mix, baby arugula blend, baby romaine, and crisp ranch and Caesar salad kits. The company … Full EDBLW analysis →

Key strengths

  • Revenue Growth Consistent Revenue growth volatility is low (stability score 0.74), suggesting sticky customer base.

Key risks

  • Commodity Pressure / Weak Differentiation Gross margin at 11.1th percentile with high volatility suggests weak pricing power or commoditized products.
  • Elevated Debt Risk Debt serviceability is weak (score 0.22), raising refinancing risk.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Weak
14
Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Pricing Power

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Cost Advantage

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Customer Stickiness

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Capital Efficiency

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Resilience

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Scale & Market Position

Where EDBLW ranks in Farm Products

EDIBLE GARDEN AG INC C/WTS (TO ranks #26 of 29 scored companies in Farm Products by moat score — the top 90%. The widest moat in the group is Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD) at 80/100.

# Company Moat score Rating
21 Limoneira Co LMNR 36/100 Developing
22 Davis Commodities Limited DTCK 35/100 Developing
23 Alico, Inc. ALCO 29/100 Developing
24 Local Bounti Corporation LOCL 24/100 Weak
25 Edible Garden AG Incorporated EDBL 19/100 Weak
26 EDIBLE GARDEN AG INC C/WTS (TO EDBLW 19/100 Weak
27 Shineco, Inc. SISI 16/100 Weak
28 AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. AQB 13/100 Weak
29 AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. AGRI 0/100 Weak

See every General Corporate company ranked by moat score →

How EDBLW scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 14 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 16 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 36 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 19 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 18 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 13 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding EDBLW's moat

What is EDIBLE GARDEN AG INC C/WTS (TO 's moat score?

EDIBLE GARDEN AG INC C/WTS (TO (EDBLW) scores 19 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as weak. It ranks #26 of 29 scored companies in Farm Products, the top 90%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 28 companies in Farm Products. Its strongest defense is Customer Stickiness (36/100) and its weakest is Scale & Market Position (13/100).

How does EDIBLE GARDEN AG INC C/WTS (TO compare with other Farm Products companies?

EDIBLE GARDEN AG INC C/WTS (TO ranks #26 of 29 scored companies in Farm Products by moat score. The widest moat in Farm Products is Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD) at 80/100. The companies ranked closest are Edible Garden AG Incorporated (EDBL) at 19 just above it and Shineco, Inc. (SISI) at 16 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 28 companies in Farm Products. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is EDIBLE GARDEN AG INC C/WTS (TO scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for EDIBLE GARDEN AG INC C/WTS (TO ?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and EDBLW scores: Pricing Power (14), Cost Advantage (16), Customer Stickiness (36), Capital Efficiency (19), Resilience (18), Scale & Market Position (13). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000