Emerald Holding, Inc. EEX

Competitive advantage analysis · communication-services

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
49/100
Developing

About Emerald Holding, Inc.

Emerald Holding, Inc. operates as a business-to-business (B2B) event organizer in the United States. The company provides B2B trade shows and conferences; B2C showcases and a scaled hosted buyer platform; and B2B print publications and digital media products, which provides industry specific business news and information across various sectors. It also offers B2B e-commerce and digital merchandising solutions to manufacturers … Full EEX analysis →

Competitive advantage assessment

Key strengths

  • Scale Supporting Profitability Profitability at scale is strong (score 0.77), demonstrating competitive advantages.
  • Cash Generation Consistent Cash generation is consistent (score 0.70), indicating reliable business model.

Key risks

  • Liquidity Concerns Liquidity is concerning (score 0.11), raising questions about short-term obligations.
  • Revenue Volatility Signals Weak Stickiness Revenue volatility is high (stability score 0.11), suggesting weak customer stickiness.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Moderate
55

Where EEX ranks in Advertising Agencies

Emerald Holding, Inc. ranks #19 of 45 scored companies in Advertising Agencies by moat score — the top 42%. The widest moat in the group is Glory Star New Media Group Hold (GSMGW) at 83/100.

Moat scores for companies ranked near EEX in Advertising Agencies
# Company Moat score Rating
15 WPP plc WPP 55/100 Moderate
16 Travelzoo TZOO 53/100 Moderate
17 Stran & Company, Inc. SWAGW 52/100 Moderate
18 Stran & Company, Inc. SWAG 49/100 Developing
19 Emerald Holding, Inc. EEX 49/100 Developing
20 Haoxi Health Technology Limited HAO 46/100 Developing
21 Marchex, Inc. MCHX 45/100 Developing
22 Able View Global Inc. ABLV 44/100 Developing
23 Able View Global Inc. Warrant ABLVW 43/100 Developing

See every General Corporate company ranked by moat score →

How EEX scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 54 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 49 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 47 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 25 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 39 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 81 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding EEX's moat

What is Emerald Holding, Inc.'s moat score?

Emerald Holding, Inc. (EEX) scores 48 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #19 of 45 scored companies in Advertising Agencies, the top 42%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 44 companies in Advertising Agencies. Its strongest defense is Scale & Market Position (81/100) and its weakest is Capital Efficiency (25/100).

How does Emerald Holding, Inc. compare with other Advertising Agencies companies?

Emerald Holding, Inc. ranks #19 of 45 scored companies in Advertising Agencies by moat score. The widest moat in Advertising Agencies is Glory Star New Media Group Hold (GSMGW) at 83/100. The companies ranked closest are Stran & Company, Inc. (SWAG) at 49 just above it and Haoxi Health Technology Limited (HAO) at 46 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 44 companies in Advertising Agencies. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Emerald Holding, Inc. scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Emerald Holding, Inc.?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and EEX scores: Pricing Power (54), Cost Advantage (49), Customer Stickiness (47), Capital Efficiency (25), Resilience (39), Scale & Market Position (81). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000