1847 Holdings LLC EFSH

Competitive advantage analysis · industrials

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
—
Insufficient data

Ranked against 26 peers in Conglomerates

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Insufficient Data
—
Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Pricing Power

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Cost Advantage

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Customer Stickiness

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Capital Efficiency

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Resilience

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Scale & Market Position

Where EFSH ranks in Conglomerates

1847 Holdings LLC ranks #27 of 27 scored companies in Conglomerates by moat score — the top 100%. The widest moat in the group is Steel Partners Holdings LP LTD (SPLP) at 79/100.

# Company Moat score Rating
19 Tejon Ranch Co TRC 38/100 Developing
20 Air T, Inc. AIRT 37/100 Developing
21 Air T, Inc. - Trust Preferred S AIRTP 37/100 Developing
22 NN, Inc. NNBR 37/100 Developing
23 Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. FBYD 24/100 Weak
24 Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Wa FBYDW 23/100 Weak
25 Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. TUSK 21/100 Weak
26 Planet Green Holdings Corp. PLAG 3/100 Weak
27 1847 Holdings LLC EFSH 0/100 Weak

See every General Corporate company ranked by moat score →

How EFSH scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Not measurable · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Not measurable · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Not measurable · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Not measurable · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Not measurable · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Not measurable · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding EFSH's moat

What is 1847 Holdings LLC's moat score?

1847 Holdings LLC (EFSH) scores 0 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as weak. It ranks #27 of 27 scored companies in Conglomerates, the top 100%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 26 companies in Conglomerates.

How does 1847 Holdings LLC compare with other Conglomerates companies?

1847 Holdings LLC ranks #27 of 27 scored companies in Conglomerates by moat score. The widest moat in Conglomerates is Steel Partners Holdings LP LTD (SPLP) at 79/100. The companies ranked closest are Planet Green Holdings Corp. (PLAG) at 3 just above it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 26 companies in Conglomerates. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is 1847 Holdings LLC scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for 1847 Holdings LLC?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and EFSH scores: Pricing Power (not measurable), Cost Advantage (not measurable), Customer Stickiness (not measurable), Capital Efficiency (not measurable), Resilience (not measurable), Scale & Market Position (not measurable). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000