Planet Green Holdings Corp., through its subsidiaries, engages in the production and distribution of cyan brick, black, and green tea products in the People's Republic of China, Hong Kong, and Canada. It imports and distributes beef and mutton products; produces and sells ethanol fuel and fuel additives, including alcohol based clean fuel, liquid wax, arene, and biomass fuel; and manufactures …
Full PLAG analysis →
Competitive advantage assessment
Key risks
Commodity Pressure / Weak DifferentiationGross margin at 0th percentile with high volatility suggests weak pricing power or commoditized products.
ROIC Below WACC or PeersROIC at 0th percentile suggests inefficient capital deployment.
The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks
against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.
Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.
Premium access
Unlock full defense analysis
Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.
Planet Green Holdings Corp. ranks #26 of 27
scored companies in Conglomerates by moat score — the top 96%.
The widest moat in the group is Steel Partners Holdings LP LTD (SPLP)
at 79/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near PLAG in Conglomerates
Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.
Cost Advantage
Score 0
· 15% of the moat score
A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.
Customer Stickiness
Score 11
· 15% of the moat score
Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.
Capital Efficiency
Score 4
· 18% of the moat score
Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.
Resilience
Score 5
· 17% of the moat score
Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.
Scale & Market Position
Score 0
· 15% of the moat score
Scale matters only when it converts into economics.
Planet Green Holdings Corp. (PLAG) scores 3 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as weak. It ranks #26 of 27 scored companies in Conglomerates, the top 96%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 26 companies in Conglomerates. Its strongest defense is Customer Stickiness (11/100) and its weakest is Pricing Power (0/100).
How does Planet Green Holdings Corp. compare with other Conglomerates companies?
Planet Green Holdings Corp. ranks #26 of 27 scored companies in Conglomerates by moat score. The widest moat in Conglomerates is Steel Partners Holdings LP LTD (SPLP) at 79/100. The companies ranked closest are Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) at 21 just above it and 1847 Holdings LLC (EFSH) at 0 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 26 companies in Conglomerates. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is Planet Green Holdings Corp. scored with the Corporate Default template?
Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.
Which competitive defenses are measured for Planet Green Holdings Corp.?
The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and PLAG scores: Pricing Power (0), Cost Advantage (0), Customer Stickiness (11), Capital Efficiency (4), Resilience (5), Scale & Market Position (0). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.