Formula Systems (1985) Ltd., through its subsidiaries, provides proprietary and non-proprietary software solutions and information technologies (IT) professional services in Israel, the United States, Europe, Africa, Japan, and internationally. The company also offers software product marketing and support, computer infrastructure and integration solutions, and learning and integration. In addition, it provides IT software solutions and services, and consulting and management …
Full FORTY analysis →
Competitive advantage assessment
Key strengths
Revenue Converts Cleanly to CashCash conversion is strong (score 0.74), showing scalable economics.
Asset-Light ReturnsReturn profile is strong (score 0.77), supporting a capital-efficient model.
Key risks
Contracted Demand Looks ThinContracted demand signal is weak (score 0.35), limiting evidence of strong subscription stickiness.
The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks
against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.
Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.
Premium access
Unlock full defense analysis
Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.
Where FORTY ranks in Information Technology Services
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. ranks #25 of 78
scored companies in Information Technology Services by moat score — the top 32%.
The widest moat in the group is Mastercard Incorporated (MA)
at 84/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near FORTY in Information Technology Services
How FORTY scores on the Software & SaaS Specialized defenses
Pricing Power
Score 60
· 20% of the moat score
In software, pricing power is visible in gross margin: a vendor that has to discount in order to renew gives it up first.
Recurring Revenue Stickiness
Score 39
· 18% of the moat score
Recurring revenue is the model's central claim, and it is a moat only when customers renew and expand without being re-sold each year.
Innovation Engine
Score 68
· 16% of the moat score
Software is competed away rather than depreciated, so a vendor that stops investing loses its category.
Cash Scalability
Score 77
· 18% of the moat score
The test of a software business is whether growth eventually stops consuming cash.
Capital Efficiency
Score 70
· 16% of the moat score
A software platform employs very little capital, so a genuine franchise should produce high returns on it without leverage.
Balance Sheet Resilience
Score 70
· 12% of the moat score
Software companies fund years of customer acquisition before those customers pay back, which makes access to capital a strategic variable rather than a treasury detail.
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. (FORTY) scores 63 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as moderate. It ranks #25 of 78 scored companies in Information Technology Services, the top 32%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 77 companies in Information Technology Services. Its strongest defense is Cash Scalability (77/100) and its weakest is Recurring Revenue Stickiness (39/100).
How does Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. compare with other Information Technology Services companies?
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. ranks #25 of 78 scored companies in Information Technology Services by moat score. The widest moat in Information Technology Services is Mastercard Incorporated (MA) at 84/100. The companies ranked closest are Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) at 63 just above it and TSS, Inc. (TSSI) at 62 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Software & SaaS Specialized in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 77 companies in Information Technology Services. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. scored with the Software & SaaS Specialized template?
Software costs almost nothing to reproduce, so the entire economic question is whether customers keep paying. Revenue is a subscription rather than a sale, the cost of winning a customer is paid years before that customer becomes profitable, and margins arrive only if renewals hold. The Software & SaaS template scores retention, reinvestment, and the point at which growth turns into cash.
Which competitive defenses are measured for Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.?
The Software & SaaS Specialized template measures 6 defenses, and FORTY scores: Pricing Power (60), Recurring Revenue Stickiness (39), Innovation Engine (68), Cash Scalability (77), Capital Efficiency (70), Balance Sheet Resilience (70). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.