Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund GUG

Competitive advantage analysis · financial-services

Asset Management Specialized
Overall moat score
60/100
Moderate

Ranked against 174 peers in Asset Management

Key strengths

  • Premium Fee Margins Fee margin quality is strong (score 0.73).
  • Strong Cash Conversion Cash conversion quality is high (score 0.73).

Key risks

  • AUM Retention Risk Revenue stickiness is low (stability score 0.11).
  • Margin Erosion Trend Margin trend is deteriorating (score 0.16).

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Fee Revenue Quality

Moderate
69
Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Fee Revenue Quality

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Client Retention & Revenue Stickiness

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Compensation Discipline

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Capital Efficiency

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Earnings Quality & Cash Conversion

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Balance Sheet Strength

Where GUG ranks in Asset Management

Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund ranks #46 of 173 scored companies in Asset Management by moat score — the top 27%. The widest moat in the group is Sound Point Meridian Capital Inc (SPMC) at 77/100.

# Company Moat score Rating
42 Federated Hermes, Inc. FHI 61/100 Moderate
43 New Mountain Finance Corporatio NMFC 61/100 Moderate
44 SRH Total Return Fund, Inc. STEW 61/100 Moderate
45 Gladstone Investment Corporatio GAIN 60/100 Moderate
46 Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund GUG 60/100 Moderate
47 WisdomTree, Inc. WT 60/100 Moderate
48 Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund MSDL 60/100 Moderate
49 Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund NDMO 60/100 Moderate
50 Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. VCTR 60/100 Moderate

See every Asset Management & Capital Markets company ranked by moat score →

How GUG scores on the Asset Management Specialized defenses

Fee Revenue Quality

Score 69 · 20% of the moat score

Fee revenue quality is the ability to charge above the industry's falling average and keep charging it.

Client Retention & Revenue Stickiness

Score 42 · 18% of the moat score

Assets under management leave far more easily than they arrive, and the fee leaves with them.

Compensation Discipline

Score 50 · 18% of the moat score

Compensation is the largest expense in asset management and the one that decides whether a good year ever reaches shareholders.

Capital Efficiency

Score 58 · 20% of the moat score

Asset managers are asset-light: with little capital employed, a healthy business should earn a very high return on equity, and a merely average one is a real warning.

Earnings Quality & Cash Conversion

Score 69 · 14% of the moat score

Reported profits here can be flattered by performance fees, seed-capital gains and consolidated fund accounting, none of which recur reliably.

Balance Sheet Strength

Score 82 · 10% of the moat score

Because the business needs so little capital, an asset manager carrying meaningful debt has usually borrowed to buy another manager or to fund distributions.

How each Asset Management Specialized defense is measured, in full →

Understanding GUG's moat

What is Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's moat score?

Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund (GUG) scores 60 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as moderate. It ranks #46 of 173 scored companies in Asset Management, the top 27%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 174 companies in Asset Management. Its strongest defense is Balance Sheet Strength (82/100) and its weakest is Client Retention & Revenue Stickiness (42/100).

How does Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund compare with other Asset Management companies?

Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund ranks #46 of 173 scored companies in Asset Management by moat score. The widest moat in Asset Management is Sound Point Meridian Capital Inc (SPMC) at 77/100. The companies ranked closest are Gladstone Investment Corporatio (GAIN) at 60 just above it and WisdomTree, Inc. (WT) at 60 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Asset Management Specialized in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 174 companies in Asset Management. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund scored with the Asset Management Specialized template?

An asset manager owns almost nothing. It charges a fee on someone else's money, pays much of that fee out in compensation, and keeps the remainder — so its economics turn on the fee rate it can defend, whether client money stays, and how much revenue survives the bonus pool. The Asset Management template scores those questions rather than the balance sheet, which in this industry is largely beside the point.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund?

The Asset Management Specialized template measures 6 defenses, and GUG scores: Fee Revenue Quality (69), Client Retention & Revenue Stickiness (42), Compensation Discipline (50), Capital Efficiency (58), Earnings Quality & Cash Conversion (69), Balance Sheet Strength (82). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000