Lanvin Group Holdings Limited operates as a couture house for men and women in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, North America, Greater China, and other Asian countries. It operates through Lanvin, Wolford, Caruso, St. John, Sergio Rossi, and Other and Holding Companies segments. The company offers ready-to-wear products comprising bodysuits, tops, trousers, dresses, skirts, jumpsuits, jackets, and cardigans; made-to-measure products; …
Full LANV analysis →
Competitive advantage assessment
Key risks
ROIC Below WACC or PeersROIC at 0th percentile suggests inefficient capital deployment.
Revenue Volatility Signals Weak StickinessRevenue volatility is high (stability score 0.00), suggesting weak customer stickiness.
The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks
against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.
Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.
Premium access
Unlock full defense analysis
Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited ranks #10 of 11
scored companies in Luxury Goods by moat score — the top 91%.
The widest moat in the group is Envela Corporation (ELA)
at 77/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near LANV in Luxury Goods
Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.
Cost Advantage
Score 0
· 15% of the moat score
A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.
Customer Stickiness
Score 0
· 15% of the moat score
Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.
Capital Efficiency
Score 13
· 18% of the moat score
Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.
Resilience
Score 6
· 17% of the moat score
Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.
Scale & Market Position
Score 18
· 15% of the moat score
Scale matters only when it converts into economics.
What is Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's moat score?
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited (LANV) scores 10 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as weak. It ranks #10 of 11 scored companies in Luxury Goods, the top 91%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 10 companies in Luxury Goods. Its strongest defense is Scale & Market Position (18/100) and its weakest is Cost Advantage (0/100).
How does Lanvin Group Holdings Limited compare with other Luxury Goods companies?
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited ranks #10 of 11 scored companies in Luxury Goods by moat score. The widest moat in Luxury Goods is Envela Corporation (ELA) at 77/100. The companies ranked closest are Charles & Colvard Ltd. (CTHR) at 27 just above it and MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. (MYTE) at 0 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 10 companies in Luxury Goods. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is Lanvin Group Holdings Limited scored with the Corporate Default template?
Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.
Which competitive defenses are measured for Lanvin Group Holdings Limited?
The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and LANV scores: Pricing Power (13), Cost Advantage (0), Customer Stickiness (0), Capital Efficiency (13), Resilience (6), Scale & Market Position (18). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.