Playtika Holding Corp. PLTK

Competitive advantage analysis · communication-services

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
48/100
Developing

About Playtika Holding Corp.

Playtika Holding Corp., together with its subsidiaries, develops mobile games in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia Pacific, and internationally. The company owns a portfolio of casual and social casino-themed games. It distributes its games to the end customer through various web and mobile platforms and direct-to-consumer platforms. The company was founded in 2010 and is … Full PLTK analysis →

Competitive advantage assessment

Key strengths

  • Revenue Growth Consistent Revenue growth volatility is low (stability score 0.96), suggesting sticky customer base.
  • Cash Generation Consistent Cash generation is consistent (score 0.76), indicating reliable business model.

Key risks

  • Elevated Debt Risk Debt serviceability is weak (score 0.29), raising refinancing risk.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Developing
47

Where PLTK ranks in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

Playtika Holding Corp. ranks #14 of 26 scored companies in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia by moat score — the top 54%. The widest moat in the group is NetEase, Inc. (NTES) at 83/100.

Moat scores for companies ranked near PLTK in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
# Company Moat score Rating
10 PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc. MYPSW 55/100 Moderate
11 Nexters Inc. Warrant GDEVW 53/100 Moderate
12 GDEV Inc. GDEV 53/100 Moderate
13 Sohu.com Limited SOHU 49/100 Developing
14 Playtika Holding Corp. PLTK 48/100 Developing
15 Roblox Corporation RBLX 43/100 Developing
16 Golden Matrix Group, Inc. GMGI 42/100 Developing
17 Take-Two Interactive Software, TTWO 39/100 Developing
18 Snail, Inc. SNAL 37/100 Developing

See every General Corporate company ranked by moat score →

How PLTK scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 47 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 36 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 85 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 30 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 42 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 48 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding PLTK's moat

What is Playtika Holding Corp.'s moat score?

Playtika Holding Corp. (PLTK) scores 48 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #14 of 26 scored companies in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia, the top 54%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 25 companies in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia. Its strongest defense is Customer Stickiness (85/100) and its weakest is Capital Efficiency (30/100).

How does Playtika Holding Corp. compare with other Electronic Gaming & Multimedia companies?

Playtika Holding Corp. ranks #14 of 26 scored companies in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia by moat score. The widest moat in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia is NetEase, Inc. (NTES) at 83/100. The companies ranked closest are Sohu.com Limited (SOHU) at 49 just above it and Roblox Corporation (RBLX) at 43 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 25 companies in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Playtika Holding Corp. scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Playtika Holding Corp.?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and PLTK scores: Pricing Power (47), Cost Advantage (36), Customer Stickiness (85), Capital Efficiency (30), Resilience (42), Scale & Market Position (48). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000