Restaurant Brands International QSR

Competitive advantage analysis · consumer-cyclical

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
70/100
Moderate

About Restaurant Brands International

Restaurant Brands International Inc. operates as a quick service restaurant company in Canada, the United States, and internationally. It operates through six segments: Tim Hortons, Burger King, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Firehouse Subs, International, and Restaurant Holdings. The company owns and franchises Tim Hortons, a coffee and baked good restaurant chain that offers beverages, sandwiches, wraps, flatbread pizzas, and others; Burger … Full QSR analysis →

Competitive advantage assessment

Key strengths

  • Revenue Growth Consistent Revenue growth volatility is low (stability score 0.96), suggesting sticky customer base.
  • Cash Generation Consistent Cash generation is consistent (score 0.87), indicating reliable business model.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Moderate
68

Where QSR ranks in Restaurants

Restaurant Brands International ranks #9 of 57 scored companies in Restaurants by moat score — the top 16%. The widest moat in the group is Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) at 83/100.

Moat scores for companies ranked near QSR in Restaurants
# Company Moat score Rating
5 Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. CMG 78/100 Strong
6 Rave Restaurant Group, Inc. RAVE 76/100 Strong
7 Wendy's Company (The) WEN 72/100 Moderate
8 Darden Restaurants, Inc. DRI 72/100 Moderate
9 Restaurant Brands International QSR 70/100 Moderate
10 Yum China Holdings, Inc. YUMC 70/100 Moderate
11 Texas Roadhouse, Inc. TXRH 69/100 Moderate
12 Nathan's Famous, Inc. NATH 68/100 Moderate
13 Brinker International, Inc. EAT 68/100 Moderate

See every General Corporate company ranked by moat score →

How QSR scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 68 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 84 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 91 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 68 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 55 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 59 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding QSR's moat

What is Restaurant Brands International's moat score?

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) scores 70 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as moderate. It ranks #9 of 57 scored companies in Restaurants, the top 16%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 56 companies in Restaurants. Its strongest defense is Customer Stickiness (91/100) and its weakest is Resilience (55/100).

How does Restaurant Brands International compare with other Restaurants companies?

Restaurant Brands International ranks #9 of 57 scored companies in Restaurants by moat score. The widest moat in Restaurants is Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) at 83/100. The companies ranked closest are Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) at 72 just above it and Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) at 70 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 56 companies in Restaurants. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Restaurant Brands International scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Restaurant Brands International?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and QSR scores: Pricing Power (68), Cost Advantage (84), Customer Stickiness (91), Capital Efficiency (68), Resilience (55), Scale & Market Position (59). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000