Safe & Green Holdings Corp. SGBX

Competitive advantage analysis · industrials

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
21/100
Weak

About Safe & Green Holdings Corp.

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. provides prefabricated modular structures using wood or steel as the base material for residential and commercial use in the United States. The company operates through three segments: Construction; Medical; and Development and Environmental. It provides fabricated and finished buildings, including floors, windows, doors, interior painting, electrical wiring and fixtures, plumbing outlets and bathrooms, roofing systems, … Full SGBX analysis →

Competitive advantage assessment

Key strengths

  • ROIC Sustainably Above Peers ROIC at 100.0th percentile exceeds peers and WACC, demonstrating superior capital allocation.

Key risks

  • Commodity Pressure / Weak Differentiation Gross margin at 5.3th percentile with high volatility suggests weak pricing power or commoditized products.
  • Elevated Debt Risk Debt serviceability is weak (score 0.10), raising refinancing risk.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Weak
4

Where SGBX ranks in Metal Fabrication

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. ranks #19 of 20 scored companies in Metal Fabrication by moat score — the top 95%. The widest moat in the group is Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) at 83/100.

Moat scores for companies ranked near SGBX in Metal Fabrication
# Company Moat score Rating
12 Mayville Engineering Company, I MEC 49/100 Developing
13 Tredegar Corporation TG 47/100 Developing
14 Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation AP 31/100 Developing
15 TechPrecision Corporation TPCS 31/100 Developing
16 Ryerson Holding Corporation RYI 28/100 Developing
17 Highway Holdings Limited HIHO 25/100 Developing
18 Tungray Technologies Inc TRSG 24/100 Weak
19 Safe & Green Holdings Corp. SGBX 21/100 Weak
20 Mingteng International Corporat MTEN 20/100 Weak

See every General Corporate company ranked by moat score →

How SGBX scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 4 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 6 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 32 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 60 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 8 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 5 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding SGBX's moat

What is Safe & Green Holdings Corp.'s moat score?

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX) scores 20 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as weak. It ranks #19 of 20 scored companies in Metal Fabrication, the top 95%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 19 companies in Metal Fabrication. Its strongest defense is Capital Efficiency (60/100) and its weakest is Pricing Power (4/100).

How does Safe & Green Holdings Corp. compare with other Metal Fabrication companies?

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. ranks #19 of 20 scored companies in Metal Fabrication by moat score. The widest moat in Metal Fabrication is Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) at 82/100. The companies ranked closest are Tungray Technologies Inc (TRSG) at 24 just above it and Mingteng International Corporat (MTEN) at 20 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 19 companies in Metal Fabrication. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Safe & Green Holdings Corp. scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Safe & Green Holdings Corp.?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and SGBX scores: Pricing Power (4), Cost Advantage (6), Customer Stickiness (32), Capital Efficiency (60), Resilience (8), Scale & Market Position (5). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000