Energous Corporation WATT

Competitive advantage analysis · technology

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
22/100
Weak

About Energous Corporation

Energous Corporation provides wireless charging system solutions in the United States. The company develops over-the-air Wireless Power Network (WPN) technology that integrates advanced semiconductor chipsets, software controls, hardware designs, and antenna systems to enable radio frequency (RF) based charging for Internet of Things (IoT) devices. Its applications include retail sensors, electronic shelf labels, asset trackers, air quality monitors, motion detectors, … Full WATT analysis →

Competitive advantage assessment

Key strengths

  • Operating Leverage in Effect Operating leverage is evident (score 0.97), with margins expanding over time.
  • Strong Liquidity Buffer Liquidity position is strong (score 0.74), providing operational cushion.

Key risks

  • Commodity Pressure / Weak Differentiation Gross margin at 25.8th percentile with high volatility suggests weak pricing power or commoditized products.
  • ROIC Below WACC or Peers ROIC at 20.0th percentile suggests inefficient capital deployment.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Weak
10

Where WATT ranks in Scientific & Technical Instruments

Energous Corporation ranks #25 of 34 scored companies in Scientific & Technical Instruments by moat score — the top 74%. The widest moat in the group is Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) at 85/100.

Moat scores for companies ranked near WATT in Scientific & Technical Instruments
# Company Moat score Rating
21 Coherent Corp. COHR 46/100 Developing
22 BlackSky Technology Inc. BKSY 33/100 Developing
23 Wrap Technologies, Inc. WRAP 25/100 Developing
24 Genasys Inc. GNSS 23/100 Weak
25 Energous Corporation WATT 22/100 Weak
26 Astrotech Corporation ASTC 21/100 Weak
27 SOBR Safe, Inc. SOBR 21/100 Weak
28 Focus Universal Inc. FCUV 18/100 Weak
29 SaverOne 2014 Ltd. Warrant SVREW 18/100 Weak

See every General Corporate company ranked by moat score →

How WATT scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 10 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 23 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 14 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 9 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 31 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 53 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding WATT's moat

What is Energous Corporation's moat score?

Energous Corporation (WATT) scores 22 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as weak. It ranks #25 of 34 scored companies in Scientific & Technical Instruments, the top 74%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 33 companies in Scientific & Technical Instruments. Its strongest defense is Scale & Market Position (53/100) and its weakest is Capital Efficiency (9/100).

How does Energous Corporation compare with other Scientific & Technical Instruments companies?

Energous Corporation ranks #25 of 34 scored companies in Scientific & Technical Instruments by moat score. The widest moat in Scientific & Technical Instruments is Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) at 84/100. The companies ranked closest are Genasys Inc. (GNSS) at 23 just above it and Astrotech Corporation (ASTC) at 21 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 33 companies in Scientific & Technical Instruments. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Energous Corporation scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Energous Corporation?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and WATT scores: Pricing Power (10), Cost Advantage (23), Customer Stickiness (14), Capital Efficiency (9), Resilience (31), Scale & Market Position (53). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000