Mission Produce, Inc. AVO

Competitive advantage analysis · consumer-defensive

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
55/100
Moderate

About Mission Produce, Inc.

Mission Produce, Inc. engages in the sourcing, farming, packaging, marketing, and distribution of avocados, mangoes, and blueberries to food retailers, wholesalers, and foodservice customers in the United States and internationally. The company operates through three segments, Marketing and Distribution; International Farming; and Blueberries. It also provides ripening, bagging, custom packing, logistical management, and quality assurance services. In addition, the company … Full AVO analysis →

Competitive advantage assessment

Key strengths

  • Cash Generation Consistent Cash generation is consistent (score 0.88), indicating reliable business model.
  • Operating Leverage in Effect Operating leverage is evident (score 0.92), with margins expanding over time.

Key risks

  • Commodity Pressure / Weak Differentiation Gross margin at 25.0th percentile with high volatility suggests weak pricing power or commoditized products.
  • ROIC Below WACC or Peers ROIC at 33.3th percentile suggests inefficient capital deployment.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Developing
26

Where AVO ranks in Food Distribution

Mission Produce, Inc. ranks #7 of 14 scored companies in Food Distribution by moat score — the top 50%. The widest moat in the group is G. Willi-Food International, L (WILC) at 75/100.

Moat scores for companies ranked near AVO in Food Distribution
# Company Moat score Rating
3 US Foods Holding Corp. USFD 66/100 Moderate
4 Calavo Growers, Inc. CVGW 60/100 Moderate
5 Performance Food Group Company PFGC 58/100 Moderate
6 The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. CHEF 57/100 Moderate
7 Mission Produce, Inc. AVO 55/100 Moderate
8 The Andersons, Inc. ANDE 53/100 Moderate
9 United Natural Foods, Inc. UNFI 45/100 Developing
10 Mannatech, Incorporated MTEX 37/100 Developing
11 AMCON Distributing Company DIT 34/100 Developing

See every General Corporate company ranked by moat score →

How AVO scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 26 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 81 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 59 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 42 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 72 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 79 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding AVO's moat

What is Mission Produce, Inc.'s moat score?

Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) scores 55 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as moderate. It ranks #7 of 14 scored companies in Food Distribution, the top 50%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 13 companies in Food Distribution. Its strongest defense is Cost Advantage (81/100) and its weakest is Pricing Power (26/100).

How does Mission Produce, Inc. compare with other Food Distribution companies?

Mission Produce, Inc. ranks #7 of 14 scored companies in Food Distribution by moat score. The widest moat in Food Distribution is G. Willi-Food International, L (WILC) at 75/100. The companies ranked closest are The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. (CHEF) at 57 just above it and The Andersons, Inc. (ANDE) at 52 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 13 companies in Food Distribution. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Mission Produce, Inc. scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Mission Produce, Inc.?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and AVO scores: Pricing Power (26), Cost Advantage (81), Customer Stickiness (59), Capital Efficiency (42), Resilience (72), Scale & Market Position (79). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000