GAN Limited GAN

Competitive advantage analysis · consumer-cyclical

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
31/100
Developing

Ranked against 19 peers in Gambling

Key strengths

  • Operating Leverage in Effect Operating leverage is evident (score 0.79), with margins expanding over time.

Key risks

  • ROIC Below WACC or Peers ROIC at 0th percentile suggests inefficient capital deployment.
  • Revenue Volatility Signals Weak Stickiness Revenue volatility is high (stability score 0.07), suggesting weak customer stickiness.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Weak
13
Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Pricing Power

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Cost Advantage

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Customer Stickiness

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Capital Efficiency

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Resilience

Premium

Signals, strengths and risks for Scale & Market Position

Where GAN ranks in Gambling

GAN Limited ranks #13 of 20 scored companies in Gambling by moat score — the top 65%. The widest moat in the group is Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) at 73/100.

# Company Moat score Rating
9 Flutter Entertainment plc FLUT 54/100 Moderate
10 Bragg Gaming Group Inc. BRAG 52/100 Moderate
11 DraftKings Inc. DKNG 43/100 Developing
12 Gambling.com Group Limited GAMB 39/100 Developing
13 GAN Limited GAN 31/100 Developing
14 High Roller Technologies, Inc. ROLR 16/100 Weak
15 SharpLink Gaming, Inc. SBET 15/100 Weak
16 PlayAGS, Inc. AGS 0/100 Weak
17 Everi Holdings Inc. EVRI 0/100 Weak

See every General Corporate company ranked by moat score →

How GAN scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 13 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 29 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 14 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 29 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 42 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 64 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding GAN's moat

What is GAN Limited's moat score?

GAN Limited (GAN) scores 31 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #13 of 20 scored companies in Gambling, the top 65%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 19 companies in Gambling. Its strongest defense is Scale & Market Position (64/100) and its weakest is Pricing Power (13/100).

How does GAN Limited compare with other Gambling companies?

GAN Limited ranks #13 of 20 scored companies in Gambling by moat score. The widest moat in Gambling is Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) at 73/100. The companies ranked closest are Gambling.com Group Limited (GAMB) at 39 just above it and High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR) at 16 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 19 companies in Gambling. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is GAN Limited scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for GAN Limited?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and GAN scores: Pricing Power (13), Cost Advantage (29), Customer Stickiness (14), Capital Efficiency (29), Resilience (42), Scale & Market Position (64). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000