Jerash Holdings (US), Inc., through its subsidiaries, manufactures and exports customized, ready-made sportswear, and outerwear through knitted fabrics. The company offers t-shirts, jackets, vests, pants, shorts, and polo shirts, as well as personal protective equipment. It serves various brands and retailers in the United States, Hong Kong, Germany, China, Jordan, and internationally. Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. was incorporated in 2016 …
Full JRSH analysis →
Competitive advantage assessment
Key strengths
Margins Stable Across CyclesOperating margin volatility is low (stability score 0.72), demonstrating pricing resilience across cycles.
Strong Liquidity BufferLiquidity position is strong (score 0.88), providing operational cushion.
Key risks
Revenue Volatility Signals Weak StickinessRevenue volatility is high (stability score 0.32), suggesting weak customer stickiness.
Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. ranks #15 of 26
scored companies in Apparel Manufacturing by moat score — the top 58%.
The widest moat in the group is Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)
at 83/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near JRSH in Apparel Manufacturing
Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.
Cost Advantage
Score 68
· 15% of the moat score
A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.
Customer Stickiness
Score 29
· 15% of the moat score
Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.
Capital Efficiency
Score 62
· 18% of the moat score
Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.
Resilience
Score 61
· 17% of the moat score
Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.
Scale & Market Position
Score 32
· 15% of the moat score
Scale matters only when it converts into economics.
Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. (JRSH) scores 49 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #15 of 26 scored companies in Apparel Manufacturing, the top 58%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 25 companies in Apparel Manufacturing. Its strongest defense is Cost Advantage (68/100) and its weakest is Customer Stickiness (29/100).
How does Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. compare with other Apparel Manufacturing companies?
Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. ranks #15 of 26 scored companies in Apparel Manufacturing by moat score. The widest moat in Apparel Manufacturing is Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) at 83/100. The companies ranked closest are V.F. Corporation (VFC) at 51 just above it and Neo-Concept International Group (NCI) at 49 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 25 companies in Apparel Manufacturing. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. scored with the Corporate Default template?
Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.
Which competitive defenses are measured for Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.?
The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and JRSH scores: Pricing Power (45), Cost Advantage (68), Customer Stickiness (29), Capital Efficiency (62), Resilience (61), Scale & Market Position (32). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.