Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited provides one-stop apparel solutions in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and internationally. The company offers a suite of services in the apparel supply chain, which includes market trend analysis, product design and development, raw material sourcing, production and quality control, and logistics management. It sells knitwear and apparel products under the les 100 …
Full NCI analysis →
Competitive advantage assessment
Key strengths
Consistent Cash GenerationCash generation is strong and consistent (score 0.92).
Margins Stable Across CyclesOperating margin volatility is low (stability score 0.84), demonstrating pricing resilience across cycles.
Key risks
ROIC Below WACC or PeersROIC at 38.1th percentile suggests inefficient capital deployment.
Neo-Concept International Group ranks #16 of 26
scored companies in Apparel Manufacturing by moat score — the top 62%.
The widest moat in the group is Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)
at 83/100.
Moat scores for companies ranked near NCI in Apparel Manufacturing
Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.
Cost Advantage
Score 51
· 15% of the moat score
A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.
Customer Stickiness
Score 56
· 15% of the moat score
Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.
Capital Efficiency
Score 31
· 18% of the moat score
Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.
Resilience
Score 62
· 17% of the moat score
Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.
Scale & Market Position
Score 46
· 15% of the moat score
Scale matters only when it converts into economics.
What is Neo-Concept International Group's moat score?
Neo-Concept International Group (NCI) scores 49 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as developing. It ranks #16 of 26 scored companies in Apparel Manufacturing, the top 62%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 25 companies in Apparel Manufacturing. Its strongest defense is Resilience (62/100) and its weakest is Capital Efficiency (31/100).
How does Neo-Concept International Group compare with other Apparel Manufacturing companies?
Neo-Concept International Group ranks #16 of 26 scored companies in Apparel Manufacturing by moat score. The widest moat in Apparel Manufacturing is Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) at 83/100. The companies ranked closest are Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. (JRSH) at 49 just above it and LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd. (LITB) at 42 just below it.
How is the moat score calculated?
Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 25 companies in Apparel Manufacturing. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.
Why is Neo-Concept International Group scored with the Corporate Default template?
Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.
Which competitive defenses are measured for Neo-Concept International Group?
The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and NCI scores: Pricing Power (49), Cost Advantage (51), Customer Stickiness (56), Capital Efficiency (31), Resilience (62), Scale & Market Position (46). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to our use of cookies.
Read our cookie policy
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled.