Kimberly-Clark Corporation KMB

Competitive advantage analysis · consumer-defensive

Corporate Default
Overall moat score
67/100
Moderate

About Kimberly-Clark Corporation

Kimberly-Clark Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and markets personal care products in the United States. It operates in two segments, North America and International Personal Care. The North America segment offers disposable diapers, training and youth pants, swimpants, baby wipes, feminine and incontinence care products, reusable underwear, facial and bathroom tissue, paper towels, napkins, wipers, tissue, towels, soaps and … Full KMB analysis →

Competitive advantage assessment

Key strengths

  • Margins Stable Across Cycles Operating margin volatility is low (stability score 0.93), demonstrating pricing resilience across cycles.
  • Cost Leadership Position Operating margin at 75.9th percentile with strong OpEx control demonstrates cost leadership.

Key risks

  • Liquidity Concerns Liquidity is concerning (score 0.10), raising questions about short-term obligations.

The dashed ring is the peer median. Defense scores are percentile ranks against peers, so 50 is roughly the typical company in this group.

Upgrade to unlock the signals and evidence behind each defense.

Premium access

Unlock full defense analysis

Get key signals, strengths, and risks for every moat dimension.

Upgrade to Premium Unlock all moat defenses and evidence.

Pricing Power

Moderate
68

Where KMB ranks in Household & Personal Products

Kimberly-Clark Corporation ranks #8 of 32 scored companies in Household & Personal Products by moat score — the top 25%. The widest moat in the group is Procter & Gamble Company (The) (PG) at 81/100.

Moat scores for companies ranked near KMB in Household & Personal Products
# Company Moat score Rating
4 Unilever PLC UL 72/100 Moderate
5 Colgate-Palmolive Company CL 72/100 Moderate
6 Church & Dwight Company, Inc. CHD 71/100 Moderate
7 United-Guardian, Inc. UG 68/100 Moderate
8 Kimberly-Clark Corporation KMB 67/100 Moderate
9 Kenvue Inc. KVUE 67/100 Moderate
10 Acme ACU 65/100 Moderate
11 Clorox Company (The) CLX 61/100 Moderate
12 Raytech Holding Limited RAY 57/100 Moderate

See every General Corporate company ranked by moat score →

How KMB scores on the Corporate Default defenses

Pricing Power

Score 68 · 20% of the moat score

Pricing power is the ability to raise prices without losing volume.

Cost Advantage

Score 86 · 15% of the moat score

A cost advantage means delivering the same product for structurally less — better purchasing, denser distribution, a more automated process.

Customer Stickiness

Score 73 · 15% of the moat score

Stickiness is what makes revenue repeat without being re-won every year.

Capital Efficiency

Score 68 · 18% of the moat score

Capital efficiency asks what the company earns on the money tied up in the business.

Resilience

Score 50 · 17% of the moat score

Resilience is the capacity to get through a bad year on its own terms — enough liquidity, enough interest cover, and enough cash generation to avoid a rescue financing or a forced sale.

Scale & Market Position

Score 61 · 15% of the moat score

Scale matters only when it converts into economics.

How each Corporate Default defense is measured, in full →

Understanding KMB's moat

What is Kimberly-Clark Corporation's moat score?

Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) scores 67 out of 100 on the StatsAlpha Moat Map, which rates its competitive advantage as moderate. It ranks #8 of 32 scored companies in Household & Personal Products, the top 25%. The score is a weighted composite of 6 competitive defenses, each measured against industry peers of 31 companies in Household & Personal Products. Its strongest defense is Cost Advantage (86/100) and its weakest is Resilience (50/100).

How does Kimberly-Clark Corporation compare with other Household & Personal Products companies?

Kimberly-Clark Corporation ranks #8 of 32 scored companies in Household & Personal Products by moat score. The widest moat in Household & Personal Products is Procter & Gamble Company (The) (PG) at 81/100. The companies ranked closest are United-Guardian, Inc. (UG) at 68 just above it and Kenvue Inc. (KVUE) at 67 just below it.

How is the moat score calculated?

Each company is scored with an industry-specific template — Corporate Default in this case, chosen because the defenses that matter to a bank are not the ones that matter to a software company. Every defense combines several financial signals, and each signal is measured as a percentile against a peer group of 31 companies in Household & Personal Products. The defenses are then weighted to produce the overall score out of 100.

Why is Kimberly-Clark Corporation scored with the Corporate Default template?

Most public companies sell a product or a service at a margin, so the moat question is whether that margin survives contact with competitors. The Corporate template scores the six defenses that show up in a general operating company's financial signature: whether it can hold price, produce more cheaply than rivals, keep its customers, earn a return above its cost of capital, withstand a downturn, and turn size into economics.

Which competitive defenses are measured for Kimberly-Clark Corporation?

The Corporate Default template measures 6 defenses, and KMB scores: Pricing Power (68), Cost Advantage (86), Customer Stickiness (73), Capital Efficiency (68), Resilience (50), Scale & Market Position (61). Each is scored independently as a percentile against peers, so a company can be strong on one and weak on another — the overall score reflects how those defenses are weighted for this industry.

Send Feedback
Please select a category.
0/1000